Victorians we’re dirty, smelly bastards.
Only the poshest houses would have a private toilet, and that would have been outside.
The majority had to share a khazi with lots of other families.
None of these shit houses had any sort of washing facilities.
The standard of hygiene was horrendous.
Houses had no bathrooms.
People would go many months without washing. Hardly anyone had a toothbrush.
The stink must have been horrible.
The streets were awash with shit.
Shit from horses, cattle and humans.
People’s clothes must have been caked in the stuff.
Charles Darwin was a smelly, soap dodging Victorian, and a cunt.
He was also a fraud.
He managed to get a place on the government funded, map planning ship, The Beagle.
I suppose that if you are going to get a 5 year cruise paid for then you had better come up with some serious shit to justify it.
He came up with his theory of evolution.
It was called Darwin’s Theory of Evolution.
It still is.
Notice the emphasis on ‘Darwin’s’.
It’s as if other scientists don’t exactly buy into his theory.
They can’t endorse it buy simply calling it ‘Evolution’.
No, it’s Darwin’s and as it’s just a theory it may well be wrong.
Here’s why I think that Darwin was a cunt….
Out of the tens of thousands of species of animals that he studied, there was not one single example of anything that could be proved to be in a state of evolving.
There was no credible ‘missing link’.
There still isn’t.
Animals do not evolve to suit their environment.
There simply is not time to do that.
They can’t live in an unsuitable environment for millenia before they finally evolve to accept it.
If the basic requirements for their life is not present then that life will not be there in the first place.
Dinosaurs roamed Earth for about 200 million years and never evolved into anything else but dinosaurs.
The species that we have today that are directly related to dinosaurs haven’t evolved at all.
In fact, they have degenerated.
A Deinosuchus, the dinosaur crocodile who was a nasty cunt and about 10,5 meters long would be ashamed of his modern day relative.
If Darwin’s theory held true then the evolving Deinosuchus, or crocodile which we now call it, would be about 40 meters long. It would be able to sprint overland faster than a cheetah and be able to hunt and eat anything that it wanted.
Hippos in one mouthful would just be a snack.
An entire elephant would be his breakfast.
As far as Darwin is concerned then humans in the future would evolve to suit their environment.
They will therefore have very small brains as all knowledge will be available to them on their hand held devices.
No need to actually learn or remember anything.
They would have excellent eyesight to see the screens and thin pointed fingers to tap the buttons.
As it would be unnecessary to actually know anything, to explore anywhere or to produce anything new then the human race will regress and not evolve.
Darwin was indeed a cunt.
And a hairy faced, soap dodging, freeloading, slap head cunt at that.
Nominated by: The Artful Cunter
I strongly favour a Theory of Devolution.
There’s every indication that we’re going backwards as a species.
Afternoon all.
7
I think you mean De-Evolution.
Devolution is what Satan Blair gave the Scotch & the Welsh.
Are we not men?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRguZr0xCOc
Afternoon Ron 👍
6
No Mingejuice we are not men
We are DEVO!
2
Devolving into mongoloids …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b-nFSUXcuM
0
The young are doing their best not to evolve, due to constantly being ran over whilst fiddling on mobile phones. At least it will stop the back becoming hunched and thumbs being ridiculously enlarged.
5
Isn’t Baboon Lammy the missing link?
8
Beat me to it. 😁
4
Possibly, but between what and what?
3
Cabbage and Cauliflower
5
I don’t credit him with the intelligence of either.
1
A festering pile of horse manure and The Flabbotomous
1
It’s all the Sky Fairy.
6
Just as plausible as thinking plant life evolved in animal life.
If humans are merely highly evolved apes, where are the talking dogs and why haven’t the remaining are species evolved into a parallel species of human?
Utter rot.
By the way, his book was called The origin of species, not The theory of evolution. like thstvothet fraud Einstein, he very conveniently came up with a theory that cannot be disproven asbit requires millions of years of observation, justcas Einstein”s requires the ability to travel at the constant, ie the speed of light, which has also been proven notbto be constant.
From what I can see not a small proportion of the most ardent atheists and evolutionists consider his treatise severely flawed.
1
I came up with E=mc³, but I was full of native substances at the time. Juices.
1
Were they creative juices Sam?
1
I have failing eye sight, fingers like sausages and I know everything. I am indeed yesterday’s man.
afternoon. (and it is lovely weather here just now.)
5
Darwin had to pay to go on the cruise, or likely his father did.
As for evolution, all you are doing is putting on a very good show of ignorance. The evidence is everywhere and undeniable.
You are likely correct in the aroma department, though.
8
Any links to an intermediate species.
I mean, there should be literally millions of them.
No?
Thought not.
0
PS Piltdown man doesn’t count 🙂
0
Ok we’ll just believe in god then.
3
Allen,
As Sherlick was prone to saying, ‘When all other possible solutions have been eliminated, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the answer”.
So, God it is then.
0
Polar bears all share dna with Irish brown bears, so there was some evolution right there?
It’s a slow process, survival of the fittest.
Massive reptiles lost a lot of their big prey, so the smaller ones flourished?
The theory of Mike.
You’re welcome 😊
2
It’s still a bear. it’s not a dog, cat or monkey, etc.
There is an enormous difference between adaptation and evolution.
Changing fur colour is not evolution.
0
I’m not partaking in evolution.
Fuck that.
End up with a head like a watermelon and spindly limbs and gills?
Like some cunt off the x files?
Nope, I’m proud of my prominent brow ridge ,
My vestigial tail,
And traceable linage to cousin sasquatch.
Darwin was a heretic .
3
We didn’t get a bathroom until 1961, outside bog and tin bath in front of fire.
The house I was born in didn’t even have electric lights, gas mantle’s on the wall..one cold tap and a slopstone sink…! ( Condemned )
Yorkshire…
Victorian’s, “luxury”..
3
I don’t Adam and Eve it
3
Do members of Genesis believe in Darwin’s Theory of Evolution?
0
I must say Artie ,
You paint a very dim picture of Victorian life!
They were great days!!
Days of Empire 🇬🇧🇬🇧
It meant something to be British then.
And Johnny foreigner feared us!!
The British army was the greatest army in the world.
We were a powerhouse of industry and innovation.
It had much to envy!
A 100% white population
Public hangings
You could murder a east end prostitute and never get caught.
So what if the plumbing wasnt perfect?
And few kids up chimneys is a small price to pay.
Fuck em
3
Darwin just went on that voyage to interfere with as many female ooga-boogas as possible, the jammy git.
2
I wonder how Darwin’s proponent’s account for nıg-ņog IQ?
They haven’t advanced one iota for hundreds of thousands of years.
2
Nonsense, dey wuz kangs, dontchaknow?
WAKANDA FOREVER!
0
Indeed Thomas,indeed.
Best not mention those utter cunts the Aborigine,who after fifty thousand years inhabiting one of Planet Earth’s most unspoilt regions,have amounted to totally fucking nothing.
Darwin my arse.
1
They say we evolved from the primeval ooze.
Maybe they mean just the politicians?
I can see that.
And from lizards.
I can see that.
Lot of people still look like they catch flies with their tongue.
He was a pretty brave bloke really.
Lots of people back when he wrote Origin of the species firmly believed the biblical version of the creation of man.
And you know how reasonable religious types are,
Wonder he didn’t get lynched!
0
The politicians didn’t evolve at all, they’re still primordial ooze.
0
There is so much wrong with this obscenely-long nomination that I just can’t be bothered refuting every single, ignorant point and giving explanations and citations.
Although I’d recommend watching the Systematic Classification of Life series by the Youtuber Aron Ra. It’s comprehensive and answers a lot of the utter bollocks in the nomination.
It might be quite time consuming to watch as there are a lot episodes in the series (if you are actually willing to learn that is).
2
If Darwin was right then Afghans would have invented the jet aircraft and The Somali would be able to fucking time travel…straight into one of Starmers Benefits Hotels.
Darwin was a lying cunt who just wanted to grope some Samoan topless birds.
Oven..oh fuck he’s already been “naturally selected” the smartarse long dead bullshitter.
0
Fuck me it’s not difficult to understand a few things vis a vis evolution.
You can see genetic variations amongst our own species. Some of us are born with genetically advantageous qualities e.g. in terms of resilience to disease, others of us are born with predispositions to illnesses that may limit our ability to reproduce and survive. Those people carrying the better genes reproduce and pass those genes on. Those carrying the disadvantageous genes die or fail to reproduce and the inferior genes die with them.
Genetic variation also happens randomly as we are bombarded with solar rays that disrupts our DNA giving rise to variation in the species – sometimes to the advantage of the individual with the genetic variation, sometimes to their disadvantage. We’re not all the same, and we don’t reproduce the same genetic material, but the superior genes survive and contribute to the improved adaptation to their environment of the individuals with the superior genetic material, and the populations that descend from them.
As for writing off evolution as “only a theory” that’s like saying gravity is “only a theory”. In science, the word “theory” doesn’t mean “a nice idea I’ve just had but we can’t be sure is true”, it’s a combined body of study, supported by evidence, with experimental analysis, peer reviewed and verified, and in its totality can amount to a proof of concept (as is the case with evolution, and is certainly also the case with gravity) but always with the ability – as science permits – to be updated and improved.
It’s easy to deny the existence of something that has such an abundance of scientific proof behind it, but it tends only to show you don’t know what you’re talking about. A good place to start if you really want to improve your grasp of evolution would be the works of Stephen J Gould, Richard Dawkins and Neil de Grasse Tyson. If you can read those books and still think “it’s only a theory” then your perceptions are likely clouded by the religious explanation of life and the universe – which really doesn’t have any evidence whatsoever to sustain it.
It’s also worth noting, before poo pooing science, that science WORKS. The fact that we’re all exchanging thoughts and amusing anecdotes on this online forum via sophisticated electronic communications networks is thanks to the rigour and efficacy of science, not some bearded cunt on a cloud plucking a harp.
0
So, the science is settled then?
Like covid jabs?
Btw, if being an atheist means displaying the fuck-witted, petty, narrow-minded spite of Dawkins, I’ll give it a miss.
0