I recently gave Disney a right cunting for its determination to trash its own legacy of animation with live action ‘woke’ remakes of classic films.
Next in line for the treatment is the legendary 1937 adaptation of the Grimms’ fairy tale ‘Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs’, now being ‘re-imagined’ as ‘Off White and the Seven Ethnically Diverse Magical Creatures’. That’s right; Snow White is now Snow Latinx, there are no dwarfs, and no love story with Prince Charming. Our heroine is now focused on ‘her journey’ to leadership and empowerment. She’s a real Hollywood ‘girl boss’. That’s right, another one.
As if all this ‘woke’ shit wasn’t bad enough, we now have to endure the nauseating sight and sound of the insufferable lead, Rachel Zegler, preening in front of the camera and spouting off in the most smug and irritating manner possible about the film and her role in it.
I could wax lyrically for many paragraphs on the subject of why such an utterly unlikeable Hollywood brat should be immediately kicked down the nearest flight of stairs. But actually it’s better just to let this vapid poseur condemn herself, so I invite you all to watch this short clip (esp. from the 30 second mark) if you can manage to contain your nausea in the process;
Just fuck off over there with the rest of the Tinseltown airheads, and when you get there, fuck off again, you absolute fucking clown.
‘Weird, weird’.
Nominated by Ron Knee.
Looks like a Cunt
9
Talks like a cunt…
7
Touché Sir, or is that banned
2
All these mad cunts are always on “a journey”
Imagine Errol Flynn or Maureen O’Hara gobbing off about gender politics or “empowerment”?
Modern Hollywood is rammed full of total Cunts.
Specially female empowered diversity pronoun oven.
19
It’s the bits where she calls the prince ‘a stalker’ that are really a hoot.
Elsewhere she says that the kiss where the prince awakens SW was ‘not consensual’, and rambles on about SW ‘finding her own agency’ (whatever that means precisely).
This woman’s claim to fame is that she’s previously been in a couple of box office bombs, and now she thinks she’s Norma Desmond.
Zegler is a 24-carat cunt, a prime example of the kind insufferable Hollywood twat who thinks that the world and his wife are just waiting for her to give her opinions on anything.
Should be hammered into the ground with a baseball bat.
25
For a Hollywood starlet she’s fucking ugly. I wouldn’t touch it with yours.
And the woman interviewing her couldn’t get further up her arse if she tried.
Amen.
12
It’s Zegler’s capacity to get her head up her own arse that’s truly astonishing.
She should be in the Guinness Book of Records.
16
I gave her too much credit, saying she was a pawn in Disney’s sad, myopic attempt to get ESG cash.
She is one of these young activists trying to get screen/stage gigs by being obnoxiously woke on Twitter and calling out any problemstic behaviour by any public figure daring to question fashionable dogma.
Social media crawls with them.
16
I once heard of a porn film called ‘Snow White And The Seven Perverts’. I didn’t get to see it unfortunately.
0
Do you mind Ron, if I don’t want to infect my mind with the short clip and live with the memories of all other things the imbeciles from across the pond are ruining for us all. The one thing these idiots can’t touch, is our memories and what I’ve collected over the years, when wallowing in nostalgia.
6
You’d think that after crashing and burning ‘Star Wars’ and ‘Indiana Jones’, Disney would think long and hard about trashing the legacy of its own animation catalogue with more ‘live’ remake wokery.
But apparently not.
Zegler is a symptom of the deeper disease that is currently affecting American mainstream film-making.
Mercifully all may not be lost; the outstanding ‘Sound of freedom’ and ‘Oppenheimer’ show that the candle still burns.
10
I make sure not to infect my brain with modern day crap. I’ve enough material to last me umpteen lifetimes. I love being on here criticising other people’s tastes when the opportunity arises. Its the devilment in me.
7
I’ve got that dreaded disease of what I’m interested in, are the only things that count.
3
Even formerly hot Gal Gadot is spouting feminist nonsesnse.
She’s gone right down in my estimation. No doubt she’d be gutted(!).
As for Rachel Zegler, she’d not be talking much after I’d destroyed her fore and aft; she’d be walking (awkwardly) around shell-shocked.
10
Have you advised her on a comfortable shoe for later ?
2
I’m sure you could always make Gal atone for her haughtiness with a good spanking over your knee Mr CE couldn’t you?
0
That arse demands to be given a thrashing imo.
I’ll do it as a public duty, and donate the fee to charity.
0
Don’t know about any other cunters but I’d love to be part of a woke Beaner ffm session with Rachel and that other crazed spic bint AOC.
5
I like AOC, taken in isolation from her nonsense, well worth a rattling, decent knockers too.
Can’t knock a girl with nice knockers.
2
Absolutely.
Just gag her first.
3
Our only hope to please this lot is to have the todger chopped off. Not happening.
5
Has she got any tits? Fuck off in the kitchen bitch pronto, bacon and sausage sandwhich black coffee no sugar and nosh on my member. Dozy up her arse cunt.
8
Flatter than a week old glass of lemonade.
12
If it tanks at the box office you know what the response will be: “It shows how far we have to go before the majority have progressive views” or some such bollocks. It won’t be “We got that wrong, maybe most people don’t want this artificial shite forced down their throats”. I certainly hope it is an abject failure. I’d love to tell her my five year old daughter loves the original due to it being exactly what it is: an entertaining film for children, nothing more.
10
All the predictions for this re-make are that it’s going to tank big time, and I very much hope that’s the case. Hollywood, and Disney in particular, seems to be as attractive as the contents of a septic tank.
Of course muppets like Zegler will say that it’s all the audience’s fault for being submissive to ‘the patriarchy’ and not embracing the film’s ‘values’.
They’re so far up their own arses that they’re incapable of grasping the fact that the audience justs wants to be entertained, not lectured to.
20
Always makes me laugh when they blame the audience, alienating them even further.
I guess they all believe the phantom ESG money will make up for it.
8
True CP.
Zegler is this month’s Phoebe Waller-Bridge, except that W-B has got bigger tits.
4
Woke re-makes of films is definitely cuntish, but you can always ignore them.
What I don’t like are films that are censored because some cunt somewhere may get upset.
A few nights ago I watched the Clint Eastwood film “Two Mules for Sister Sara”.
Of course I had seen it before, but this time round anything even mildly upsetting was cut.
If they carry on with this sort of censorship there will be fuck all left.
9
Thats the reason people have started to abandon streaming services. Not just modern entertainment being toilet matter, but also far too much censorship of old films and TV.
Ive noticed this with youtube channels as well. BBC Comedy Greats killing punchlines from scenes in Blackadder.
6
Wonky remakes won’t bother me, I’ve got everything down from the start of the DVD invention.
3
Just out of interest Sammy, just how big is your collection?
I’ve got about a couple of hundred of my favourite screwball, noir and western ‘golden age’ classics on dvd. Your collection sounds much more extensive.
0
If I were Prince Charming and found this thing slumbering in its glass coffin, I’d less inclined to kiss it awake than drive a foot of good english oak through its heart.
13
And Eucalyptus up the rancid gash.
6
Throw her on the bonfire 🔥🔥🔥🔥. Dozy trout.
9
She looks like she takes it in between the bum cheeks.
4
Hope so, preferably before Mr Cunt Engine has a go.
6
That would be like boring a new hole for the Channel Tunnel.
4
Ha Ha 😂🤣
1
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought Snow White was so called because her skin was white as snow.
That aside, I wouldn’t kiss Zegler if I needed mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.
I imagine most frogs would shy away too.
7
Apparently, The wizard of oz is next for a retarded re-telling and it will be a ‘modern reimagining of the iconic musical’
I’m overcome by a desire to watch the dirty harry movies one after the other.
7
I bloody hope not, PC, and a good afternoon to you.
I adore the Wizard of Oz and dread the thought of it being modernised.
Dorothy would be a faģgy young lad.
All the witches would be tran§bumders.
The cowardly lion would be a brave young female lion.
The scarecrow would be a pakı for some reason.
The tin man would be a chınk (made of poor quality rusty chınky metal).
The yellow brick road would be rainbow.
The only possible saving grace is if the flying monkeys were played by real life mọngs like that drooling Rosie Jones spacco.
11
Afternoon Thomas, afternoon all, and what an undoubted clusterfuck of biblical proportions it will be.
You haven’t seen the new script have you?
LGBUIUPU*IUPIH+_&%$£:@{}:~ is indeed going to find it’s way in, and the director is known for ‘diverse’ casts.
I think your avatar should direct.
4
Dorothy will be, let’s say, of a different ethnic persuasion, who secretly longs for an s and m thing with the non-binary wicked witch.
Oh, and you won’t be to sing ‘ding dong the wicked witch is dead’ anymore, although of course ‘Over the Rainbow’ will still feature prominently.
It’s guaranteed to pack the punters in.
3
They made an all black remake of it in the 70’s called The Wiz
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wiz_(film)
Unsurprisingly it bombed. What I could never understand is why the renowned director Sidney Lumet was involved in this shitefest.
3
Thanks for this bit of info mystic.
I must try and track a copy of this classic down…
Not.
3
The only thing R Z is of interest, are her thrice holes being occupied simultaneously.
3
And from the misery in her eyes, Harvey Wankstain must’ve made that possible before being found out.
1
She also looks a bit bud bud ding ding, but I’d ring her ting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1qBRcN7R5U
1
Looks like Rachel’s having a stroke in this pic:
https://images.app.goo.gl/GV73D3cTwSgb7kfB7
Or she’s got colic.
3
Have you been whispering sweet nothings in her ear?
3
It’s because you Thomas are entering her tunnel of chocolate. She doesn’t know whether to scream or tolerate you doing some back door boogieing.
4
Or Sir Les Patterson has farted next to her after just eating some Tasmanian Blue.
I’d hazard a guess that she loves the smell of her own farts tho.
4
Probably half mad with hunger?
Needs a pie down her neck.
Looks like she’s just stepped off the mothership,
Big fuck off head on a pencil neck,
Your talking bollocks lollypop head.
The only prince that’d tamper with you is Andrew.
And your not ‘ snow white’ .
More shitstained undercrackers.
7
And the 7 dwārves were miners.
And as we know in Hollywood they’re all miner attracted people.
Keep a tight grip of your belt Dozy.
8
Minors as in young, or miners from down’t pit like ?
1
If you look at the photos from the location shoot, only one of the ‘magical woodland creatures’ is from the vertically challenged community.
Here’s what a spokesman for the little persons’ community thinks on Disney taking away work opportunities for him and his colleagues.
Disney is dwarfphobic, the bigoted cunts!
0
Bastard; forgot the link;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUexJRvaidI
0
They are all vegan cunts these days. No wonder they all look ill!
3
They’re all carrying on as though she’s starring in some Shakespearian epic. She’s a hole filler, with awaiting holes to be filled.
3
Probably a Biafran.
Cheer up titless.
Treat yourself to a bowl of rice Krispies and a big hat for your whopper head.
Acting used to look fun,
With real characters like Ollie Reed, Robert Mitchum, Dennis Hopper and Robert Shaw
Nowadays it’s all thumb suckers crying about woke shite .
Boring bastard’s.
9
Yes it’s gone back to the old ‘golden age’ era where stars were contracted to studios and handled. Still, back then Hollywood made some of it’s best films, unlike today.
0
“The original was made in 1937…..and it shows!”
What the fuck would she know about 1937 and the values and culture of that time? It may as well be 1637 as far as she knows, the fucking brainwashed money grabbing dullard.
11
I can just imagine Zegler saying of ‘Casablanca’ (in that same tone of sneering condescension) ‘it was made in 1942…and quite. evidentially. so.’
The pimple-headed moron.
8
Snow tanned and the seven special needs.
Cinderella and the Ponce
The Gizzard of Oz (pg)
Lord of the Ring, enough said
The Famous Fags and Timmy the neutered Dog.( he’s in a transitioning period)
0
I’m imagining a remake of “The Jungle Book.” The animals are all wokies dressed in costumes, or “furries” as they call them these days. All wearing stud collars, gimp masks and on leads in good LGBTQI+ fashion. They would be complaining about climate change destroying their habitat, transphobic Nazis and some contagious disease called Trump. The kids would love it!
Well, perhaps not. A bit too much like being back at school!
2
The remake of the Jungle Book was made a few years ago. It wasn’t bad.
People call these live action remakes but they’re not. They’re almost as dependent on animation as the originals. Only children would believe otherwise, but then the media employs the most infantile minds.
Same with nearly all blockbusters these days; they are cartoons for children, but with the principal cast the only element actually filmed.
Over the past few years my contemporaries have asked if I wanted to join them to watch CGI shit on the big screen.
I’ve usually seen the trailer online and say, ‘nah, i’d rather watch a film’.
Some twig but others are puzzled.
The last film like that I saw at the cinema was Avengers: Infinity War, or as I call it, ‘Infinity Shrek’. Completely boring adaptation of the old Marvel comics I used to read when I was a kid and it looked like, well, Shrek.
0
Bang on CP.
Well put.
0
She wouldn’t of got through the studio gates in 1937.
That nice Mr Disney would of heard the name Zegler…..
Straight on the phone to J Edgar Hoover.
Uncle Walt wouldn’t have some commie picaninnie anywhere near his animation.
She might of got a bit part in Song of the South.
6
I really hope the Prince is cast as a crackhead Crip from the Southside with lips like a swollen sink plunger. Would Rachel swap spit with that on her ‘Journey’. Like fuck she would, the holier than thou cunt bubble.
2
The Prince? You mean Harry Halfwit? Yeah…..and Sparkletits could play Snow White. She’d fucking love that!
4
Off topic but HOT news. Manhunt for Daniel Khalife is under way in Londonistan.
Word has it that the cunt is working for the Iranian raggies and was a solider in our army, escaped from the land of de bleck man, waaaaaaandworth prison, clinging underneath a van in a Mc Donald’s chefs outfit and might be going through your bins, or wifes knickers soon.
If anyone from IsaC should happen upon him, do your duty, put him out of his misery.
7
Albeeb lies/news was addressing him Mr.
Err… why?
1
Because he is a gentleman of the highest order…
As Bli Beebie (who are probably hiding him becuase he’s WOKE and a Snowflake – could be the next Huw) reported this cunt was allowed to work in the kitchen.
Let me ponder this, hmmmm.
Former soldier, making fake bombs, collecting information which may be useful to rogue states – ok, he’s a proper crim, 007 style evil cunt.
Given access to a kitchen – hmmmm, the above doesn’t suggest this cunt has culinary skills useful for the kitchen. Why was this cunt not in solitary, or better still put out on a raft in the Channel and then used for target practice?
5
When I joined the military you used to have to declare if you had any Irish in your family going back three or four generations .
Clearly wokeness means you don’t have to declare any carpet kissers in your family despite us spending the last 35 years fighting them on and off
Daft cunts deserve everything they get
3
Our disgusting MoD don’t want patriots in the services, or any useless white men.
They’re reaping what they’ve sown.
No disrespect to those serving aboard the HMS Queen Elizabeth, but that thing is a sitting duck without the yanks providing a battlegroup for it.
0
Hmmm… Touch of The Tarbrush about her methinks. 🤫
4
Jimmy Tarbrush (sorry, dad joke)
1
My post earlier today apparently wasn’t approved after moderation. Can’t think why. Can you give me a clue?
1
I once referred to a group of people who were persecuted during WW2 and liked showers and I was cancelled.
Not all language, terms for people or anything proper naughty is allowed on her.
I am sure GCHQ and other security services monitor this site…
They’re coming for you….
0
I once referred to a group of people who were persecuted during WW2 and liked showers and I was cancelled.
Not all language, terms for people or anything proper naughty is allowed on her.
I am sure GCHQ and other security services monitor this site…
They’re coming for you….
👻
1
‘GCHQ; always listening to our customers’
(only joking fellas, honest)
2
My comment was modded earlier and doesn’t appear to pass the test.
I mentioned f aggs but i was referring to smoking cigarettes
Will they come for me, the waiting to be insulted brigade of fk wits
1
The rot started long, long ago. When the Jungle Book was released on VHS (1993) I remember picking up a copy and looking to see if there was any acknowledgement of the original author. Kipling’s name appeared nowhere on the box, which claimed that the contents were by Walt Disney, and no-one else. I left the tape lying where I had found it. Granted, Kipling is probably still spinning in his grave at what Disney did to his masterpiece, but still…
3
They just kept the bear necessities on the front of the box.
6
Nice one!
4
Ssssssss….
2
Horse teeth, pug eyes, trout lips… is it actually human?
One day the pendulum will swing back, and this will be restored to its rightful classic status…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LR6Oe1xXaLc
2
Christ, how has this not been banned already?
How are THEY still allowing us to watch?
2
It’s hard to find it entire or unaccompanied by righteous indignation, but here’s another bit for you –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtUdGB3vw-8
It might be that as a WW2 USG propaganda film (moral, unassuming black guy in tin helmet gets girl because he keeps secrets) it’s not as vulnerable to woke cunts’ censorship?
0
Grenfell Follies.
0