Have you all heard about the small budget indie film ‘Sound of Freedom’? Made by the tiny Angel Studio, it stars Jim Caviezel as a US government agent who sets out to save some kids from vicious child smugglers in Columbia.
This film is based on the true story of agent Tim Ballard, and attempts to dish the dirt on a filthy trade that nets foul child traffickers tens of billions every year. A truly worthy film swimming against a tide of woke Hollywood dross by the sound of it. What’s not to like?
Well for some reason, the lefty libs in the States are up in arms about it. I understand that Disney (say no more) formerly owned the film, and blocked its release for years. I wonder why? To make matters worse for Disneycunt, ‘Sound of Freedom’ has been kicking the ass of ‘Indy and the Dial of Dysentery’ at the box office. Oh the joy…
The film’s not even out here yet, but naturally our own, our very own lefty comic The Groaniad couldn’t wait to sing the tune of the shit left media across the pond. The nation’s favourite toilet paper reckons that the film’s ‘paranoid’. It’s all part of some fantastical ultra right wing conspiracy, with The Groaniad going out of its way to launch a personal attack the film’s star Caviezel and the production team.
But here’s a thought for The Grauniad. Maybe the reason for the film’s success is just that it tells a darn important story that needs to be told in a way that audiences can relate to, and the punters flocking to see it are telling Hollywood and its media mouthpieces to stick their woke agenda crap up their arses. The wife and I are really looking forward to seeing it, and I hope you’ll all give it a chance too.
As for The Guardian, well it’s just an arsewipe rag made by cunts, for cunts.
Nominated by Ron Knee.
Is there any strong ethnic women in it?
And the guardian’s objections to the film is probably guilt to there vile slave owning days.
” boo boo cancel them immediately “
12
A film about child trafficking and kiddy fiddling is not something that the libtards want to hear about. A bit reminiscent of Epstein Island and it’s clientele, including such praiseworthy stalwarts of the wokie Establishment as Blowjob Bill and O’Bummer. The lefties love the poofs and the trannies who, as we all know, have more than a passing interest in children.
🎶 Hey Joe…..where you going with that girl’s hair in your nose? 🎶
22
I wonder if the infamous ‘Epstein list’ will ever see the light of day after Epstein, er, ‘committed suicide’?
10
Here y’ go Ron…
https://www.ancreport.com/redice-epstein-client-list-and-more/
There is also a telephone contact book (which was probably Maxwell’s not Epstein’s as that was her role) but that is NOT the list of clients.
1
oops… That link is paywalled but same content here…
https://odysee.com/@RyanDawson:6/EpsteinClientListAttwood:1
0
Excellent Cunty thanks
1
If it’s the guardian v anything even been smeared with jam next to an ants 🐜 nest I chose the anything every time.
11
Even the Telegraph has been having a pop at the film. I am no good at links but there’s an article about it on Page 82 of the online version of the DT. Is it any surprise that the Telegraph is in such financial shit when they alienate their traditional readers?
The film was shot in 2018 so it would have been reasonable to expect release 4 or 5 years ago. Against a budget of $15 million to make the film, it has grossed $127 million. It must be saying something most people believe is right.
12
If it’s the guardian v anything even been smeared with jam next to an ants 🐜 nest I chose the anything every time.
2
If it’s the guardian v anything even been smeared with jam next to an ants 🐜 nest I chose the anything every time.
1
Sorry for multiple posts. Internet connection fucked up. Bugger.
6
Interesting nom Ron. You tube has already pulled a vid on a similar subject involving a global conspiriay of “diddlers” in the highest of offices. Its about time we were able to view “grown up” and “revealing” material about who leads us and how they are supported by a web of media cunts.
I intend ( if I get the chance ) to see this movie! Cheers Ron.
14
The left once again not understanding he ‘streisand effect’.
5
The lefty outcry proves that, even if not all lefties have overt kiddıe-fiddling tendencies, they’re all skewed in that direction, the filthy pẹrverts.
Here’s a particularly good 5 minute news article on this exact nom:
https://youtu.be/7eHI0FDqbsc
8
Great nom by the way, RK.
And good morning Gents.
8
The intention for the alphabet lot is to add “P”. Always has been – right back to the days of PIE. Yes, Harman, I’m looking at you and the rest of the Marxist scum.
14
I’ve read that the P is covered by the Q. They can’t be too overt with their advocacy at the moment. The T crowd are kiling support for the entire movement as it is, hence the creation of a breakaway LGB Alliance.
2
Excellent Thomas thanks
2
Having held my nose whilst trying not to be sick, I read the Grauniad article.
They aren’t happy are they? Although it’s not abundantly clear why.
Is it that the villains aren’t white imperialists?
They also seem to have an issue with the baddies being referred to as rebels.
A bit rich coming from a media outlet that refers to any black criminal suspect as simply ‘a man’. One country’s rebel is another country’s terrorist as far as I can make out from our msm. It just depends which side they’re on.
Anyway. It’s a load of incomprehensible leftie woke prejudice masquerading as journalism.
Yet another slippery slope towards censorship being manufactured.
10
I used to say that nothing is black and white, and was keen to read up both sides of the story. But now with the Grauniad, if it is against something, I’m all for it.
15
I suppose I am paranoid, I wonder what made me that way.
Is it the way the left are using schools to push their bum loving and gender crap down young innocent minds.
I’m off to the shops now to get more tinfoil.
11
I read both the Rolling Stone and The Guardian reviews for this film.
My mind was then immediately made up – I’m going to watch this film once it comes out here. So job done.
Interesting that The Guardian and the likes weren’t quite so negative about “Cuties” when that was released a while back.
I imagine Joe Biden has been through as many boxes of Kleenex as he has dollars that he’s sent to Ukraine, after purchasing his copy of Cuties.
10
Yeah, “Cuties” was, of course, stunning and brave. Not a diddlers wet dream at all.
9
Rolling Stone pushed the fake narrative about camous rape culture a few years ago. Woke liars.
3
Rolling Stone can piss off. I have not forgotten Rolling Stone’s ‘Black Lives Matter’ cover at the height of the Covid lockdown. It was the most anti-white magazine cover in history. And the litte white kid with his hands over his eyes, like he was about to be shot.
They can burn in Hell.
8
Great nom by the way Mr Knee 👍
8
Sniffy cunts aren’t they?
Like someone dropped a slice of bacon into their artisanal tofu salad.
If they don’t like the film,and I believe the same chorus of disapproval crops up everywhere infested by “progressives”,then it must be well worth watching.
I also read that cinemas screening it the the States have been disrupting the film by having fire drills,power outages etc..is it a conspiracy?
Hard to say but I’d put nowt past these skulking censorious cunts.
Oven.
11
Bizarre. I waded through the Guardian’s piece and I’m baffled. Maybe it’s because I’m thick but it caused me to think I must see this film if only to try to work out why it’s caused the MSM to throw all of their toys out of the pram.
9
I must be a thick Gammon, but I didn’t understand much of the verbose, pretentious writing in The Grauniad article.
Perhaps Cunters can enlighten me if this is the usual style of Tarquinesque editorial the Grauniad goes in for as I would never read it otherwise. 🤔
6
QAnon? Those nuts are at it again!
Nobody in their right mind would ever believe there was an International ring led by a mysterious Jewish Financier, that included a former President, a member of the Royal family, a Tech industry Mogul et al that went to some tropical island paradise to indulge their predilections.
Not even the idiots at the Gonadian would believe that crazy conspiracy theory.
15
This popped up on my FaceCunt feed:
The word woke is becoming more beautiful by the day. Why? Becuase the absolute worst people on earth use it as a slur against everything that is good. STAY WOKE.
Here’s my version:
The word cunt is becoming more beautiful by the day. Why?
Becuase the absolute laziest people on earth use it as an excuse to do fuck all and talk bollocks against everything they know fuck all about. DON’T BE A CUNT.
3
Shame there’s no thumbs down/fislike option on facebook posts as i can see that first paragraph getting ratioed to fuck anywhere else.
Hope there were at least some replies.
0
*dislike
0
Just watched Neil Oliver,s piece on Ron’s Yuotube link and unlike the Guardian’s baffling rant I found it crystal clear and I could identify completely with the point he is making. If you haven’t seen it yet I would urge you to invest fifteen minutes of your life in doing so.
Congratulations Ron on a brilliant and profound nomination.
11
personally I’m looking forward to seeing Sisu.
A Finnish film that has won high praise for its gore and decent story line.
As it involves killing Nazis, the Grauniad will wank themselves unconscious over it.
looks brilliant.
https://youtu.be/OGbr-aAnKTo
3
I’ve seen it and regrettably it’s played for laughs..I was expecting a Norse Rambo.
Silly me,that would have got it “cancelled”.
1
Well that’s a disappointment.
i was about to spend £15 preordering it on blu ray.
1
Great nom Ron.
I thought about reading the Grauniad article but thought better of it – no wish to sick up over my toast! You are a total hero for reading it for me and giving me the gist.
The Grauniad is a rag covered in dog shit. The Times is now The Grauniad Lite.
As for the film, it will make a change from the Disney puke that is on offer at 9 out of ten multiplex screens these days. Will definitely look out for it.
PS Has anyone else noticed that you can no longer get original Coke/Pepsi/7Up from cinema kiosks? I asked some dippy bint why they only offered diet drinks while at the same time filling kids with revolting sweets, chocolate, hot dogs and nachos. A bit hypocritical? She didn’t have a clue what I was talking about!
Fuck off.
Good morning, everyone.
11
Multiplex employees usually aren’t the brightest souls. Hate to say it but the ones at the local dump are like Aldous Huxley’s Epsilon semi morons, skulking shuffling creatures who forget to perform basic tasks such as turning the lights down to the point the lights were still up for the bbfc certificate came up.
Poor fuckers.
Not that i visit the cinema anymore for reasons given in my cunting for them.
2
I refuse to go to any cinemas now. Not like the beautiful cinemas of old, the multiplexes are soulless dumps. Staffed by cunts selling extortionate crap. Nazi style rules about (not) bringing in your own sweets or drink. And theaters full of mongs with lit up phones, noisy gobshites and screaming kids.
Just like pubs and cafes, the ‘pictures’ is another British institution that has been ruined.
3
I used to take beer to the cinema in Gun Wharf Quay down in Portsmouth with a couple of mates. Nobody said a thing.
0
Just read the Grauniad word salad article.
What a load of bollocks.
Every last one of the cunts who work for that laughable shit-rag should be on some register…if they aren’t already.
10
BBC cunts at it again, advertising one of their radio shows as including ” the four horsepersons of the apocalypse “.
What a load of mixed up nut jobs.
9
‘Horsepersons’. Lol!
6
Four Horsepersons, for fuck’s sake.🤣
Someone should tell those beebmongs that the four ‘horsepersons’ don’t exist.
2
Unless it’s a ‘reimagined’ version of a well known film, or Marvel type hero shite film filled with anti white and pro gay messaging, it’s a bad film to cunts like the Guardian.
The ‘problem’ with this film for the media is that the hero (a real life one it seems) is a straight, white male. Or are they saying it’s bullshit? I don’t know anything about the story, not something the media would cover really, is it? (a honky hero saving kids from Hispanic Joe *onces.)
Might watch it, but the subject matter might be a bit too dark for me tbh.
And Hollywood can shove their woke, anti white, reimagined and superhero shit up their fucking arses.
9
Yeah they should have ‘re-imagined’ it with Will Smith in the main role…
10
If they’d cast Ru Paul as the lead, I bet the cunts at the Guardian would’ve given it 5 stars, the fucking shithouses.
8
Maybe we should start a conspiracy theory like those loonies did about the Beatles in 1969.
This time it oould be Ru-Paul is dead…..🤔
2
Fit for the cats litter tray
5
Going to search this film out on my favourite torrent site…..!
5
It looks like a decent enough film. However, it seems a bit odd to me that it’s being championed by so many American Christians who are revelling in the fact that it’s thumping its competitors at the cinema. If these Christians cared so much about preventing kíd-fiddling, there is a rather obvious target on which they could focus: their own priests/ pastors/ Sunday school teachers/ youth pastors et cetera.
7
While some of my faith based countrymen may indeed be misguided, the fact is that the Neo-Marxist Progressive Left has loudly proclaimed the evils (real and / or imagined) of the Christian Clergy while ignoring the despicable behavior of their own much vaunted Liberal Elites.
Perhaps we can forgive the followers of the Dead God for rejoicing in the light now being shined on those who continue to act with impunity and are completely ignored by their like minded media / propaganda allies.
Trannies, Drag Queens, Groomers, LGBTQIA2S+…there is an agenda by the “Elites”. It is nefarious, insidious, and far more dangerous than that posed by a bunch of creeper priests.
It is out in the open and widely heralded by the Progressives and their Wokeist useful idiots. Yet it is ignored and denied by many. It needs to be recognized, acknowledged and fought with the same vigor that has been applied to “the clergy”.
7
Thanks to all those making kind comments about this nom.
I’m always on the lookout for cuntings that can offer something on the lighter side, but I really felt that this was something that had to be said.
The foul child trafficking ‘trade’ is worth multi billions every year, and the proceeds are rivalling those of the drug trade. As Caviezel has pointed out, a dose of crack can only be sold once, but a child can be sold many times.
What I find really disturbing about this whole matter isn’t just the hostility of lefties towards a film whose objective you’d think they’d espouse. It’s the deafening silence from the usual Hollywood glitterati gobshites who are usually only too keen to lecture us on any subject from the inequities of Trump, to diversity and climate change. Where are you Streep? Where are you De Niro and the rest of the big mouths? What a fucking cesspit Hollywood really is.
**One small correction if I may. I say in the nom that the film was made by Angel Studios, when it’s being distributed by them on behalf of the indy makers who bought the rights back from Disney.
18
Indeed Ron.
And as General Cuntster alluded to in his comment – the deafening silence from the left wing establishment over what should be the vilest of scars on humanity, is enough to make you think that those conspiracy theories may well be a lot closer to reality than many would dare to admit.
12
It’s a splendid piece of work RK…and yes,the stench of corruption emerges yet again.
8
It is a good nom. Sorry for not saying so in my main reply, but i really hate the Guardian and was focusing on how shit it is now.
I used to read it off-on when Rusbridgrr was editor. Viner has sent it into the gutter.
6
No you’re right CP.
Forty years ago I used to read The Groaniad every day, but it slowly mutated over the years into producing the festering pile of lefty woke shite it delivers today.
It really is the pits.
10
The Guardian has just become Pravda lite under editor, Katherine Viner. Absolutely appalling paper obsessed with the far-right, full of clickbait and ragebait atticles, as well as conspiracy theories of its own; The hounding of Arron Banks.
It’s gutter credentials were really shown up when one of its writers -another po-faced white girl – labelled Ukip supporters Carl Benjamin and Paul Joseph Watson ‘pricks’ in print.
The copy generated by their staff is mildly less febrile than the mentalism they post on Twitter.
As for calling out truth to power’ many veteran journos of both right and left thave said this is bunk. Max Hastings once said, they are the paper of the Establishment, and John Pilger is always attacking them for the way they crawlled up the arse of Barry o’bomber and the Democrats in Yankland..
They have a number of far left yank feminazis writing columns, like that creature Jessica Valenti.
Most of their female columnists want to be Sarah Jessica Parker in Sex and the City while the male columnists are mostly wet cunts who use sophistry to argue their case.
Why they commission Comedians to write hit pieces on various figures is hypocritical and quite sad for the comedians, whether ot’s Chris Morris, Frankie Boyle or the smug left’s favourite, Stewart Lee.
This is the sort of populist rabblerousing they accuse other outlets of.
The editoral deference to the Amerjcan tyrannical left is something to behold. New York Times say ‘jump’, and The Guardian ask ‘how high?’ Truth is they offer no alternative view to the Beeb, CNN, Huffpost, Washington Post or Channel 4.
They all screamed at Trump and pushed their conspiracy theories about his collusion woth Russia. Same about Brexit. This in turn ‘informed’ the work of right-on American performers and Hollywoodl luvvies.
You used to see this translantic Axis of bullshit at work on Twitter. All retweeting each other; BBC personalities, Guardian hacks, CNN parrots, Hollywood poodles. Complete fucking echo chamber and sharing of a mass delusion. I remember twitter convincing itself that Ed Miliband had the Tories running scared.
i gather the same is now happening over Sinead o’Connor. A big grief-wank for the luvvies and liberal left journos.
14
I say CP,that’s absolutely spot on.
4
Great post CP!
1
Superb post CP.
I actually wouldn’t wipe my arse on this shithouse rag.
10
cheers fellow bigots.
2
I must advise you Cuntamus, that speaking the truth in this Lewis Carroll / George Orwell Brave New One World Order is considered dangerous and subversive by our leaders and societal elites.
It marks you for censorship and cancellation.
Of course it is roundly admired by the rest of us.
5
O’ Connor openly supported Sinn Fein and the IRA. She also praised the Nazi regime (‘Hitler was not a bad person’), while claiming to be against child abuse. Didn’t the Nazis kill millions of kids? Yet the liberal fascist media – social and mainstream – will eulogise this person and totally ignore all the wicked and hateful things she said. I know a lot of people view these wokies as a joke, and a lot of them are. But these leftie cunts are dangerous. If they have this power over the media now, what will it be like in years to come?
4
The latest box-office figure for ‘Sound of Freedom’ is a take of $134m, based on a production budget of only $14.5m. (I believe the take is only for US theatres so far; be interesting to see what it does globally).
This is incredible for a film with virtually no publicity budget, but is going mainly by ‘word of mouth’.
Morning all.
9
i bet BBC and ITV presenters will call for ot to be banned from the UK.
Perhaaps some Lib Dem MPs and Stonewall, as well as a few priests.
‘Toxic far right problematic ‘ blah blah.
Cunts.
5
Wouldn’t surprise me.
Let’s all look forward to ‘Snow Brown and the Seven Magical Mystery Tour Creatures’ next year instead.
7
This fucker nails the attitude of Guardian ‘journalists’. He may be a ‘far right nazi bigot’, but he fucking nails it here. Intelligent and scathing.
https://millennialwoes.substack.com/p/arwa-mahdawi-and-delusions-of-candour?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
2
A superb bit of assassination Cunty. Typical Gruntiad hogwash.
Who says blokes are fixated on ‘younger’ women anyway?
My fixations are on the likes of the mouthwatering Salma Hayak and Julia Hartley-Brewer.
5
You’re right. As I age I like the older lady.
Older as in in her 30s or 40s though if well kept.
But let’s be honest, a 50 year old bird in decent nick versus a 25 year old stunner? No contest, really.
It’s not ‘male insecurity’ that makes blokes prefer the younger bird, it’s nature innit?
1
I would still hump Monica Bellucci and Christina Hendricks to Kingdom Come.
1