Stanford University of the Woke have considered and delivered some tablets of stone from on high to keep us sinners on the Correct side of the long and winding road of language. Enjoy, learn, confess and self flagellate oh and do remember to keep your balls to the wall (if you have any).
Cunters will be positively thrilled to learn that they may participate in this epoch making event by clicking through the document where they may then add their own examples of naughty usage.
University News Link (PDF Doc: Virus free – Day Admin)
Nominated by: Sir Limply Stoke
And on a similar note there’s this from mystic maven
The University of Southern California (wouldn’t you just know it), as they have banned the word ‘field’ since it contains racist connotations.
It will be removed from the curriculum and academic references such as “field of study” will instead be replaced by the word “practicum”.
Apparently this is to ”support anti-racist social work practice by replacing language that would be considered anti-Black or anti-immigrant in favour of inclusive language and to reject white supremacy, anti-immigrant and anti-blackness ideologies.”
I’m not sure these days if their academic cuntoids follow our lead or vice-versa.
Glad they gave me the heads up.
I’d hate to unintentionally offend.
That’s mighty white of them.
19
Mighty white do they still make that, or has it been banned for being racist..
7
there is a make of motorcycle shock absorber called “white power”. They have been calling themselves WP for some time now. Wonder if it was wokeism. My Triumph is completely white power as I doubt any darkies had a hand in designing it.
11
…but nicking it though?
5
Marvellous, Mis.
2
No real mystery to it. It’s all part of the plan.
If you control speech then you control thought. If you control thought then you control behavior. If you control behavior then you control society.
Someday we will all be living in our government owned apartments, freezing with our government controlled heat while awaiting the latest pronouncement from Davos on how to behave during the next existential crises.
But we will be happy eating bug sandwiches and righteously joyful in our love of diversity.
26
bit like china is now then? It’s how our leaders want us to live (not them though).
10
Aside:
“…control speech…”
The debasement of what used to be a concise and expressive language is almost complete. If you are by accident able to express a complex idea within a defined context, chances are a young audience will misunderstand you, wilfully or otherwise, since the language is no longer being properly taught.
Like you know omg.
14
@Komodo
Like totally Dude.
9
Gag me with a spoon.
4
1984 is fast approaching 😢
6
What a wonderful mental picture GC. Sounds like Utopia.
Question.
So who DOES work the actual fields where food is grown? Erm I should ask who’s practicum gets food out of the…
Fuck it I give up.
2
Hey MC
While the analogy may not be perfect…I think something along the lines of us Morlocks tending the fields for the Eloi.
5
Best not to say anything at all for fear of offending.
And a “Practicum” sounds like a painful medical procedure utilizing the Amal passage.
7
Anal not Amal. Although Amal Clooney could be involved in said medical procedure.
6
Amal passage – the inability for two apparently identical carburettors on a classic British bike to be entirely cylindrical along their length.
11
Field Marshal
Field sports
Field glasses
Football field
Expert in the field..
What are they all called something else now? F off! Ridiculous.
12
Field mice are now known as ethnicity hamsters.
15
and I’m looking at you Mr Gere…..
6
Field mice is their slave name given by a white colonialist in 1779, probably. Field mice matter.
8
Not practicum mice?
0
Left field is a yankieism. What are they going to replace it with ?
5
Port side?
6
Port side? A reference to slave ships you white supremacist.
6
‘Social Scientists’ use ‘in the field’ when doing ‘research’.
They are not actually in a field they’re on a housing estate.
They are studying the working classes at close quarters.
5
It would be better if these academics did go into a real field.
Full of cows.
And help the farmer put nappies on them to stop climate change.
6
Practicum, obviously.
‘ Hey Jodie, I’m going to plow the upper Practicum this morning”
“OK, Silas, I’ll be up about 9am with a flask of coffee”
2
To field a question?
3
It’s highly amusing that they ban words based on their own prejudices.
Who the fuck connects fields with slavery?
They do,using their own imagination.
The World Of Woke.
Rammed full of piss weak deluded cunts.
Long may they continue,it’s really quite hilarious.
24
Out here in the fields
I fight for my meals
I get my back into my living
https://youtu.be/gY5rztWa1TM
The Who being racist.
Sounds good.
7
Not sure about that Unkle. It was hilarious back in the day when they were a tiny, ignored minority who were routinely and roundly mocked.
That was our (the silent majority’s) big mistake because nowadays the cunts have taken over.
It’s got beyond a joke.
7
Loony Lefties was the term.
6
We should have had them rounded up, gassed and ovened in about 1990.
6
Please go away…. consider using Fuck Off
10
There’s always a Ni@@er in the woodpile.
These Johnny Foreigners just don’t Play the White Man
8
Well I’m not playing their stupid fucking game.
If some cunt gets offended by the use of the word ‘field’ then there really is no hope for them.
But of course, nobody is actually offended.
Black people think it’s silly to think that they are upset by these things.
As Mrs Cunter would say, “Why do these soppy white cunts think that black people need help in standing up for themselves?”.
13
I find the term ‘woke’ offensive and uninclusive to narcoleptics and the comatose. As such I shall refer to them/they/that as cunts.
6
Whoever wrote that shit is a surprising/wild person with a cognitivedisability, person with autism, neurodivergent person, but to suggest that they need a confidence check, coherence check, fact check, would be to tempt them to die by suicide, poor things.
6
‘Content Warning: This website contains language that is offensive or harmful’
Here are some examples they give:
he, she, ladies, gentlemen, fireman, guru, chief, brave, stupid, guys, manpower
These boneheads are beyond satire.
10
Walk-in to be replaced with Drop-in, as it may be deemed to be anti disabled. I then had a vision of some unfortunate person being dropped in their wheelchair from a helicopter.
Maybe they should just do away with language and revert to a series of grunts.
14
I have been offending for 50 years. The term “oy cunt” covers most possibilities.
9
They’re probably just ignorant?
That’s why adults are still in school.
Slow learners.
No shame in being a bit retarded,
Probably down to their parents?
Maybe brother and sister?
Or its down to their race😁
Either way when they finally get a job ,
It’ll broaden their education.
“You want fries with that?”
9
Firstly, why wasn’t Great Britain consulted about these changes ? For that you yankie scoundrels, we’ll have our language back.
9
This sort of shit keeps happening.
Surely to God at some point these bellends are going to realise how fucking ridiculous they sound and just knock it on the head.
Won’t they…..?
8
“Fucking ridiculous” sexually empowers people who ridicule.
“Knock it on the head” is violent, hypermasculine and probably homophobic language.
Kindly desist….whoops. I didn’t mean to denigrate the sisterhood.
5
I consider myself thoroughly bollocked Komodo.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍🏻
5
Is mankind allowed?
As in, ‘throughout the history of mankind’
Which is a gender neutral word to describe human beings, and I have never thought otherwise……but now they’ve got me thinking about something that’s never crossed my mind in all innocence.
…just like blicks bringing up racism where it doesn’t exist and was never thought as such with everyday words in general use.
7
Hey Chuff
I heard one the other day on American TV that I’m still trying to comprehend. Wemen instead of women. WE-men.
It wasn’t a mistake, a mispronounciation or some sort of dialect/accent. It was some pointy headed academician espousing a we’re all non binary, gender fluid beings fighting against toxic masculinity kind of bullshit that as you Brits might say; was really boiling my piss.
4
Toxic masculinity?
I’m struggling here. I was bought up to treat women with respect. A real man doesn’t have to hit, talk down to, or otherwise denigrate women.
The best woman I knew was my Mother. She wore the trousers in my house. My Dad was Peter Pan, the little boy who never grows up.
Her example made me who I am, and I honour and love her still. I wish she could have met the Gradly Lass. They are so alike.
4
I always like to ask people who adhere to this sort of shit to explain to me why the term “coloured person” is offensive but “person of colour” is acceptable.
6
Ten years ago “person of colour” was verboten, except when being used by a, er, person of colour. Never mind. I’d much rather be called “white” than “person without colour”…Stanford U. please note.
6
In school we refered to ‘coloured’ as anyone who wasn’t white as a descriptive term to help identify a pupil………..as in
‘Do you know Derek in class 4b?
‘Not sure…is he the coloured lad?’
‘Yes, that’s him’
Now, Derek or Yang Tung…..they were all coloureds purely for the purpose of identification..nothing racist or horrible. Was no different to saying ‘do you know Kevin in class 4b?’ ‘Is he the blonde kid?’ When you trying to differentiate a white kid from the rest.
7
I do wonder how many of these sanctimonious Sobs have researched their own ancestory to check if any of their forebears where involved, even peripherally, in the slave trade before deciding ‘field’ should not be used.
Similarly, Stanford U, are you all squeaky clean and snow white?
5
SOBs, not Sobs.
That makes them sound sympathetic.
4
Can you just imagine the group of po-faced, stick up the arse twats who came up with this shit?
I hereby suggest that all those with cognitive disabilty who put person hours into the preparation of this paper should immediately go forth and multiply.
9
Sorry Ron, ‘go forth and multiply’ won’t do. As I’m sure you’re aware, maths has been rightly condemned for being white, patriarchal and racist. With it’s mathematical undertones, the word ‘multiply’ is no longer acceptable.
Can I suggest ‘fuck off’ as an alternative as it doesn’t seem to appear on their offensive/harmful list.
7
Mmm… fuck off. Fuck off…
Yeah I like it!
3
War room = unnecessary use of violent language so becomes situation room instead.
I thought things related to wars tended to be violent?
The First & Second World Situations, The Situations of the Roses, The American Civil Situation don’t have the same gravitas somehow.
Spielberg’s series of Star Situations films with Obi-Wan Kenobi doesn’t sound quite right either.
5
There are no black people offended by these “racist” words except the “academics” who do this shit for a living, 95% of whom are fucking whitey anyway. There is no word that isn’t racist, misogynistic, homophobic or transphobic if you fucking want it to be. But you have to be a right stupid commie bastard cunt first.
16
These peoples lives on exist to look for stuff that isn’t actually there to simply justify their existence, salary and position.
7
Waffling “intellectuals” who twist language and the accepted meaning of words to suit their own narrative…. how can any Cunt think that “field” has racist overtones ?
Dangerous Gasbags who should be called out on it.
7
Maybe there is a connection to slavery Mr Fiddler.
In the Deep South those slaves who worked in the cotton fields were called ‘field ni**ers’. Those that worked in the house–‘house ni**ers’.
4
I’ll have to find another way to describe the enclosures on my vast estate,won’t I ? I’ll tell the Hounds that we’re away to walk the stone-wall enclosed huge paddocks…and hope that no Cunt is offended by my use of the word “huge” as it could refer to the common perception of the size of a Mandingo’s tool.
4
Funny. I didn’t see “house” on the list.No attention to detail, the cunts. But I guess this isn’t my large expanse of agricultural ground.
3
That’s because he actually lives in a caravan, whilst he restores his vast country pile brick by brick.
When I say pile, it is.
Calor Gas must be getting pricey, too.
I might send the old bugger a thick blanket.
3
The publishers of ‘The Field’ magazine should expect a visit from Plod any day now…
4
It’s America.
Land of the brave and home of the free!
Really?
So I suppose they’ve never heard the saying
Stick and Stones may break my bones.
But Words can never hurt me.
4
Bollocks
3
Can you imagine a group of these cunts down the pub, ‘having fun’.
6
Fun is racist.
5
Also overrated.
4
I don’t know is dipping your wick racist? Well I’m fucked.
3
‘Fun’ is a word that is harmful and detrimental to others on so many levels.
It is exploitative, in that it implies anyone enjoying himself is indifferent to the suffering of others, and is perpetuating inequality.
It is sexist; as in ‘look at the buffers on that, you could really have some fun there’.
It is racist; as in ‘here we all work on the Mississippi, here we all work while the white folks play’.
It’s ableist, in that some folks are such miserable cunts that ‘let’s have some fun’ is construed by them as mocking the afflicted.
It’s transphobic, because hairy-arsed cunts in wigs and stilettos won’t see the ‘funny side’ when a crowd of drunks yell out such endearments as ‘oi darlin, show us yer fanny!’
I could go on, but hopefully those who have come this far will see what I’m getting at.
4
No
3
No.
Fun is a word that’s probably banned amongst the group because, err, err
Because we said so, and we’re right, because we’re Sandford University intellectuals, innit!
4
I made the mistake of clicking on the link and almost soiled my unmentionables part-way reading through the `alternate definitions`.
3
You’re always in a safe space, here Sam.
Tea, two sugars and a splash.
Jump to it!
2
You want somebody to piss in your tea?
2
A splash is a drop of milk, just enough to turn it dark brown, but not enough to cool it.
We like our builders tea, in Sheffield. Puts hairs on your chest, which considering how fucking cold it is atm, I’m grateful for the extra insulation.
In Scotland, its a coo.
I thought I’d share that.
1
I know, but piss just somehow seemed more appropriate. I don’t need chest hair(which is just as well as I don’t have any) because my blubber keeps me warm. Furry blubber, go figure.
1
The typical woke left showing their own deep seated racism yet again.
4
Lordy Loordy, I jus don kno wha I can say no mo.
It’s almost like control of language gives control of speech and control of speech gives control of the narrative.
I don kno tho bossum? Is it possible to reconstruct language and eliminate opposing ideas?
3