An ermine and red bench cunting please, for the Lords and ‘ladies’ of the House of Lords, who claimed a record amount of expenses last year. One senile cunt, a crossbench, multi-millionaire old fart, claimed £44,000.
The number of these old ponces is set to rise shortly to over 800.
The government has defended them by saying that they “sat longer and did extra work last year”. Of course they fucking did, because the likes of Heselslime and Mangledbum were doing their hardest to fuck up Brexit. Yet the government are happy with them exploiting the expenses system.
Let’s demolish the House of Lords with the greedy old cunt locked inside.
Nominated by W. C. Boggs
Ok the disbandment order should be:
– The BBC.
– The (illegal) Supreme Court.
– The House of Turds.
Come on Dominic, you know you want to! 👍
40
Personally RWAC I not particularly bothered In which order , just want these bastions of leftie liberal bollocks GONE……..
20
C’mon coronavirus, your time has come! All it would take would be some sneezing wheezing Romanian cleaner and they could take out three quarters of the cunts.
31
Its a joke, a absolute piss take.
Greedy old workshy parasites.
Time for a change.
23
Especially the dirty cunts who claim nearly £50K but never turn up: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/may/30/labour-peer-never-spoke-house-of-lords-claims-50000-expenses
And that BBC batty-boy Lord Sugar…
10
Change the seats to make them all sofa material so that over time they start to ming of piss. That might make their 300 quid visits a bit more urgent.
12
Well we’ve seen the EU gravy train hit the buffers thanks to Brexit and personally nothing would give more satisfaction than seeing these “ vermin “ robed parasites losing their meal ticket,
Remote and completely out of touch with the people they purport to represent!! , sound familiar?
EU know who I’m talking about ….
Yeh those cunts …….
25
“A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool” said the Bard.
Definitely the former half of the sentence for the House of Fools.
8
“Right! Out!
Your Bard!….
Sorry.
Is that tumbleweed?..
3
Uber for a Mr Miserable?
2
“You! The statue of Shakespeare”!
“Out – you still Bard”!
Make that Uber for two! 😀
2
When people like recently cunted David Steel are given the honour and the remuneration to reside in there it’s proof enough that the H.O.L. is irrelevant.
6
£44,000 (tax free) on top of £323 a day (tax free) for doing FUCK ALL if that is what they choose to do… not to mention the subsidised bars and restaurants, all courtesy of any poor cunt who earns over £12,500 p.a.
It was even worse under Labour: if you had the audacity to earn over £6,475 you’d be paying for these entitled cunts.
Abolish!
25
“The best day-care centre for the elderly in London” as one Lib Dem peer put it.
11
You’re even looking at this too narrowly RTC. It’s not just those paying Direct taxes.
Everyone pays for this, irrespective of whether they pay income tax by paying indirect taxes such as VAT and excise duty.
VAT represents 21% of the total tax take.
Yours, Rishi Sunak
14
I did consider that Bertie, but feared overwhelming cunters with an avalanche of statistics.
VAT 21% now? I thought it was 20%.
Only 5% on jam-rags though. And domestic fuel, energy saving measures and sprog’s car seats, etc.
5
Your right, the rate is 20%. 21% is the total of all taxes taken.
5
Or to put it more clearly . . . .
The amount taken in VAT represents 21% of the total tax take in the uk i.e the total being the sum of all direct and indirect taxes collected.
5
80% of which is pissed down the shitter. 😠
4
80% of which is pissed down the shitter. 😠
2
That makes 160%!
😀
3
160% = 80% of all taxes collected?
Whose figures are those? The Shadow Home Secretary’s? 😂
4
You already pissed 60% down the shitter at 6.45pm! Then again at 6.47pm.
You need a prostate check from your GP!
😀
5
I didn’t piss anything down the shitter. It was the Government wot dunnit!
You’re probably right about a prostate check though. My piss power has fallen by at least 20% over the past 6 months. 😳
4
Join the club!
3
Oh yeah, I see what you mean now. I posted two lots of 80% pissing down the shitter.
Don’t know how that happened.
Demented cunt I am.
2
Unelected insignificant irrelevant piss stinking self entitled old farts who serve no purpose whatsoever.
The House of Lords doesn’t represent taxpayers value for money and is nothing more than an obscene, outdated racketI so just get rid of it.
18
Go back to only hereditary peers, real lords and ladies or abolish entirely.
I don’t recall hereditary peers being pro-EU, pro-islam, etc. The worst thing they’d support is the CAP.
13
Get for one day more than some people EARN in a week.
Gobshites
8
Just get rid.
If something isnt fit for purpose?
Something is outdated?
Something costs more than it delivers?
…get rid.
7
Can’t some cunt with coronavirus get in there and lick the seats, door handles etc… that’d wipe the old cunts out.
Talking of coronavirus I have it and I’m self isolating so I can get my sick pay for two weeks… cheers Boris.
I fancy a winter holiday, I might fuck off to Italy.
Piss off.
9
I saw some bell end in the paper catching a train to work, full on military style gas mask and gloves looking like he was ready for a North Korean missile strike not some cunt sneezing across the aisle.
7
Not surprising LL, watch the panic buyers and Armageddon twats strip Poundland and Tesco dry of tablets and bottled water. It could be a way if wiping out some cunts you don’t like though so respect to anyone knowingly passing it in to cunts.
6
The perfect place to assess Covid 19, infect them all and see how many die.
What fantastic data!
8
The only people who want to maintain this shithouse are the cunts in the other chamber who see it as a nice little extra pension after a lifetime of arse licking. They can also reward their mates for the money and favours they have donated to the party. An absolute pile of money sucking , libtard bastard CUNTS!!
20
Aye it’s just a retirement home for corrupt old cunts.
Raise it to the fucking ground.
7
FFS raze…
8
Be the house of Lordy Lordy soon
10
If I was broadcast to the nation while sleeping on the job my boss might have a quiet word. The chinless entitled zombies just don’t care.
12
Haven’t heard much recently about Boris’s idea of moving the Lords elsewhere. York was suggested for historic reasons but surely Rotherham or Scunthorpe would be far more appropriate. Of course, there would have to be a requirement of living no more than ten miles away …….
We could also relocate a few Whitehall mandarins to similar areas while we are at it. I am sure they would be far happier in such a diverse environment.
9
York is too nice! My top suggestions, apart from yours, are Bradford, Luton and Leicester.
4
Leicester is already full of cunts, we don’t need Lords or the Civil Service relocating here.
2
Isn’t sovereignty a wonderful thing? You get to have a long hard look at the biggest cunt collective outside of the square mile and wonder WTF are these cunts for. However, since we will revert to back to feudalism if we don’t sort this fucking mess out .. who will have the last laugh eh?
approved but tagged
2
Looks like a Santa Claus convention….
5
Good cunting… if it was the house of lordinum i could understand.
4
I know it’s spelt laudanum before all you cunters say summat😉
4
Just to throw a bit more turps on the fire…
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1249922/house-of-lords-restoration-cost-parliament-relocation-bar-restaurant-staircase
1
I really don’t get why any of those old windbag cunts are there. (Windbags in the sense of talking shite, but also windbags in the sense of what comes out of their haemorrhoid-packed holes at the other end, given the state of most of those ancient old duffers)
What purpose do they serve? Who, or what do they help in society? They are the equivalent of NHS Managers – a total waste of money and they do fuck all to achieve, or better anything.
12
It’s the only fucking care home in the country where they pay the inmates £350 a day instead of charging them. A nice little earner for failed politicians, and placemen and women like Shabbi Chuckabutti, the miserable looking little weasel.
Evening Nurse.
9
Evening Ron.
Yep, it’s a joke and a sick one at that. Talk about money for old rope! The fact that Chuck-a-batty is there too makes it even worse!! That is one woman I really cannot abide….face like a smacked arse. You would think with all of her money she would at least crack a smile every now and then.
6
“Vermin in ermine”, as RTC quoted recently.
Works for me.
Get rid, hire 400 members of the public who fulfil the relevant qualifying criteria (well they don’t want homicidal f*cking maniacs like me in there!) on fixed 5 Year contracts – I rail at the thought of this irrelevant bastion of wealth, privilege and class hatred, and it needs to change or be gone.
But it won’t, because Politics is run by the rich and privileged for their own benefit, c*nts they are.
Shuffling into Gods waiting room in a haze of Yardley perfume and piss, as I have said before.
“Lord Fox of Rampton” – you know it makes sense!
7
I couldn’t agree more, Vernon. These people don’t live in the real world like the rest of us, so ordinary citizens are needed in places like this, not privileged old (and young) farts who haven’t got a clue.
6
Got my vote.
Dont let the body count get to high.
1
Every now and then someone tries to be a clever cunt by posting something ‘academic’ about the problem of Islam.
There’s nothing ‘academic’ about it you UTTER IDIOTS. They ARE going to take us over by birth rate alone. IT’S DONE, there is no ‘turning back’.
YOU ALLOWED THIS YOU CRETINS.
Good luck to you. I’m glad I’m a poof so I haven’t sired children who will have to try and withstand it.
5
I’ve read all the comments with interest and have an alternative suggestion. That doesn’t mean it’s something I’d endorse – it’s just an alternative. But one worth considering. I will not use phrases like “the rich tapestry of international politics” or “the Privy Council” but will acknowledge an earlier mention of The Shadow Home Secretary who typifies the type of problem being addressed here.
The important thing would be (in this suggestion) to abolish the Houses of Commons – I think there’s one in Canada?
[The House of Commons of Canada (French: Chambre des communes du Canada) is the lower chamber of the bicameral Parliament of Canada, along with the sovereign (represented by the governor general) and the Senate of Canada. The House of Commons currently meets in a temporary Commons chamber in the West Block of the parliament buildings on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, while the Centre Block, which houses the traditional Commons chamber, undergoes a ten-year renovation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Commons_of_Canada%5D
Fuck me! The cunts are giving their citadel a TEN YEAR renovation!! I can only imagine the cost overruns and unexpected additional charges involved!!! (Upon reflection: no, I can’t imagine that) but I digress. Get rid of the Commons. That will deal with your internationally famous (or at least very popular with the convicts) Shadow Home Sec., after which the Upper House should be restricted to hereditary peers only. That means actual landowning plutocrats who haven’t blown the lot on showgirls or other expensive fancies. They would need to be solvent, in other words. These freaks, although freaks, at least dovetail into the real world here & there, sometimes quite often, regardless of the shape of the joinery.
There is a third component. The Privy Council. Commonwealth representatives used to participate. If they did so again there would be a transnational forum available for a frank and forthright exchange of ideas. I am not proposing that The United States would be a member of this outfit however, only places sharing our Head of State. The lower house(s) of Parliament surely are a bigger drain on the economy than the upper house(s) and if restricted to those who actually had to run their estates at a profit producing food or whatever they do would things be any worse that they are now?
I’ll shut up now. I think you’ll get the idea from that.
3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Commons_of_Canada
( hyperlink included a square bracket as %5D )
not that anyone’s probably interested what they do over there, just included for completeness
2
Did I hear this correctly? Haven’t seen it reported anywhere.MPs are to receive an EXTRA £25,000 a year for staff expenses. That’s £500 a week. If true every last penny needs to be accounted for. Absolutely stinks.
1
You did hear it correctly R1 – as MNC has said – never enough slop in the trough for these lot.
Vermin in ermine.
2
The only attractive feature of the Lords is the fact that they have much reduced influence on legislation. And even that’s a mixed blessing: they are unable to kick superfluous and idiotic Commons decisions into touch now. Unfortunately these turkeys are still able to vote against Christmas, and are incapable of sorting their own existence out. While successive governments cram their party donors and embarrassing MPs into a chamber which is already creaking at the seams with the cheerfully corrupt products of our debased political system.
Under the first Komodist Five-Year Plan, the Lords would be abolished entirely and many of its members sent for re-education in the Benbecula gulag.Instead, several committees would be formed, to the total number of 600 members, to scrutinise Commons bills individually and address:
The cost of new legislation,
The ethics ditto, replacing the bishops
The legality ditto, replacing the Law Lords
The impact on society ditto
The impact on trade ditto.
The (non-partisan)committees would then be the final arbiter on legislation A bill would have to be endorsed by the relevant committees or would have to start again. There would be as little collusion as possible between the committees to ensure each area is examined on its merits.
Appointment to the committees would be by agreement with existing committee members and restricted to candidates with proven expertise in the field of the committee. And no, not senescent captains of industry, but aspirants half way up their field and still anxious to succeed.
The Second Five-Year Plan envisages mandatory examinations for Commons candidates, with particular attention to spoken and written English, mathematics, accountancy and the history of the UK. There would additionally be interviews to establish that the candidate is fully aware of his British identity, and no other. But that’s for 2025…
3