I don’t even smoke, it’s just depressing to see smokers being forced out in the rain standing around looking miserable just so they can have a quick fag. Worse, they make a right mess outside with their discarded ciggy butts; it would be much safer and cleaner allowing them to smoke indoors.
Why not be sensible and have separate “smoking” and “non-smoking” areas in pubs, or even separate smoker’s pubs? Imposing a blanket ban is dictatorial and unnecessary.
Nominated by: Colin Murray’s Brain
Yet another one of Blair’s gifts to the nation. It always pisses me off to hear the non-smoking fuckwits who spent years whingeing about having to drink in smoke filled pubs, now whingeing about the cigarette smoke they have to walk through to get into a pub. Well what the fuck did you expect? Pubs are for all adults, not just a select few smug twats who thought live would be so wonderful if they could push smokers out. And how many pubs have closed in the years since the ban was introduced? There are FOUR within half a mile of where I live.
The fairest thing would have been to allow breweries and free houses to decide for themselves whether or not they wanted to ban smoking. But that would have lead to non smoking pubs closing, because nobody, not even the whingeing non smokers, going to them anymore, and it would have shown up the ban everything brigade for the bunch of miserable fuckwits they are.
Personally, I don’t smoke cigarettes. Never have. But I do like the odd Cuban cigar. I have no problem with people who do smoke cigarettes. Being adults, they know the risks, and they can make their own choices. I’m also not a smug, self-righteous twat, who thinks he has the right to infantalise everyone, and tell them how to live their lives. Asswipes like ASH, smug, self righteous twats.
0
The idea of smoking and non smoking pubs would have been better. That way families could take their ill behaved little fuckers to pubs where I don’t have to get fucked off by their poor parenting skills and just enjoy my pint and a ciggie.
But instead I have no choice, fucking thanks Blair, you cunt.
1
Good point. And the reason these parents have their cunts running amuck?
They are too busy taking photos of their food and pouting with their their tits out for selfies.
1
I asked this question of a mate who serves in a working mans club and one reason is fear of prosecution if employees , bar staff etc were to get smoking related diseases [ or alleged smoking diseases] . It’s now become insurance driven in other words.
Too late to go back now , and I for one am not too sad about not having to breathe in that smoke, but it is a shitty life for those who can’t give it up, looking like plague victims out in the cold.
0
I quit fags at the right time, the price and tax goes up every damn year, why is there a fucking shortage of tobacco or something? I know its the bleeding government and cunts like blair
No smoking in a pub?! this isn’t family fun time its a pub if I’m paying up the nose for a ale or spirit then I should be able to light up simple as that
Also if I ever by some small chance start up again it most definitely wouldn’t be real cigarettes or tobacco they are way too addictive and costly. I would prefer e-cigs or vapes they are not as harsh and less chems are in them
0
Wasn’t this driven by some EU directive initially (again)?
In 2008 – a year after the ban in the UK – I had to go to Paris on a jolly. They had no smoking signs all over the place in restaurants, etc., the French didn’t give a fuck and sparked up anyway. They like a smoke the French – even during a meal (not between courses either but while eating).
I don’t give a shit either way. The Blair era will go down as the nanny state era where people couldn’t be trusted to make their own minds up. Cunt!
1
I once knew a smackhead and I watched him eating his Sunday dinner, the cunt was smoking while eating! What kind of cunt can’t wait till after eating before smoking. I am a social smoker and the thought of tobacco smoke mixed with food in my mouth is nasty.
0
Sadly, as far as The Nanny State Era is concerned, I fear the smoking ban was only the beginning. There is much, much more to come…
0
I’ll be honest I don’t mince the van as I remember going out and my clothes stinking of stale smoke. I do think they should have left the decision to the Landlords/Ladies of the pub to decide. Smoking Cigarettes I should bollocks anyways at least smoke something that gives you a buzz. If your gonna risk smoking at least make it worth it.
0
“Mince the van” fucking predictive text. Mind the ban. What a cunt.
0
These new fivers need a cunting.
When you’ve got a wad they don’t play the game, they don’t wanna stick with the other fucking notes so you end up with the cunting new fiver wanting to get away. Money is hard enough to keep hold of without this cunt behaviour. On a similar subject ain’t it time to get rid of coppers/shrapnel do we need 2 pence etc when a pound gets you fuck all these days? Get rid of the of the silvers as well the lowest coin should be the pound. Fuck the £1.99 as well, the cunts.
0
One of the pubs I used to use had a public bar and a lounge bar. Although not a rule,it was accepted that smokers only smoked in the public bar,not the lounge bar. It worked just fine until “Nanny State” got involved and said no smoking anywhere. What a success that’s been,it closed 2 years ago.
I’m a heavy smoker,and to be honest,I’m going less and less to pubs. It’s not just the no-smoking,it’s the whole “family-friendly” thing that ruins it for me. I don’t invade W.I meetings or gatecrash primary- school playtimes,so why do they feel the need to annexe the one place that used to safe from screaming brats and their feckless parents.
I enjoy smoking while I have a drink,but no, everything must be geared to fit in with cunts who would be better off going to some twee cafe or “bistro” restaurant. Fuck the lot of them, I’ll give up smoking when they wrench the last one from my cold,dead fingers.
1
I’m an ex-smoker who gave it up for health reasons, and the last thing I need is to breathe in second-hand smoke, but I remember how satisfying a cigarette can be and I certainly wouldn’t want to prevent other people lighting up.
There should be smoking pubs and non-smoking pubs, with a sign outside, so that we can all please ourselves. Employees likewise.
0
Strike up yet another victory for the PC brigade gone mad!
A heterosexual, married, catholic couple have applied to adopt the two children they are currently fostering but have been banned from adopting them because the council in question didn’t agree on their views on same-sex parenting.
The couple’s statements must have been horrific right? In order for them to be banned from adopting two kids who they must love dearly and who are caring for them as foster parents already? Full of derogatory statements and hurtful labels to offend fudgepackers and bean flickers – right???
No, all they said was: “As a girl or a boy, you’re looking for a model. And, for us, the best parenting model is [a] mum and dad.”
This gets them banned from adopting the two children they’re already looking after. Hey council – whichever bunch of libbo fucking cunts you are – way to go on considering what’s best for the children in question (rather than fulfilling your appeasing liberal agenda), you cunts!
It’s just an opinion for fuck’s sake! If you asked me if I reckon kids are better off in a heterosexual family unit rather than a same-sex family unit then in my opinion (as it would be for the majority of folk in the UK) they are better off in a heterosexual family unit.
Does that mean I disagree with same-sex adoption or fostering? No it does not, it just means that I (along with the majority) believe a heterosexual family unit is best for the kids.
Yet again the majority opinion snubbed in deference to the minority opinion all because it doesn’t suit the faux liberal views of some cunting fuckwit councillors – no doubt attempting to gain browny points in case they want to chuck their hat into the ring as another appeasing libbo MP!
Utter cunts!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37976214
0
I do disagree with same-sex fostering or adoption. Children,I believe,are influenced by how they are raised and being brought up by homosexuals sends the message that deviancy is acceptable.
Never mind the poofs own questionable agenda when it comes to taking in kids,it’s not fair on impressionable children to be taught that perversion is the norm.
0
To fucking right dick i see it as a form of grooming,and brain washing.
0
Spot on Dick and Rebel. These council cunts are following the liberal left agenda of diversity without having the child’s best interests in mind. It is beyond argument that children MUST be better off with a heterosexual environment otherwise their norm will be butt fucking and bean flicking.
Stop pushing your own agenda and think of the kids who need the help.
Bunch of cunts.
0
A few weeks ago I read in the news that a mother was making her son wear panties and skirts forcing him to live like a girl.
Really fucked up shite, some of these 3rd wave femicunts have really extreme beliefs as far as “human rights” go. Forcing your boy to become a girl is a human right?!
Thankfully the mother was charged but so many of these cases go unheard or never get to court to begin with and even if they do. It usually gets explained away from the lawyers
0
My preference would be for kids to be placed within a heterosexual family unit.
However, if two good committed people (whether gay or lesbian) have it in their hearts to adopt or foster some kids, as opposed to being left in the system until they are 16 and then booted out on their jacksy to fend for themselves, then I’ll take two good people over the system – irrespective of sexual orientation – any day of the week.
Children who are products of “the system” tend not to do well, often feel rejected, fall through the cracks and often end up on skid row. There are obviously some success stories coming from “the system” but out of 100, I doubt if even a quarter of them avoid skid row or a poor standard of life. Which is why it boils my piss when we’re dictated to by the fucko libbo celeb twats and the meejah that we should be welcoming in rafts of (30yr old plus) foreign “children” while at the same time neglecting our own children who are in an equally desperate situation.
In my opinion it is best served with both a male and female role model (as per the married heterosexual couple above) but it is an opinion, and why the “thought police” think it’s acceptable to deny these kids a stable family environment based on an opinion goes beyond the pale.
“So Mr & Mrs X do you prefer Van Halen or Peter Skellern?”
“Peter who? Er, I’d say Van Halen I suppose. I liked Jump anyway.”
“Thank you for that. If you can just give me one moment, I need to make a call in the office. Won’t be a tick.”
…
…
…
“Hello. This is Doris Stuffyknickers from the child placement agency. Yes, about Mr & Mrs XYZ’s adoption application. I’m afraid they’re not suitable because even though they both have very good executive jobs and are church goers they said they liked Van Halen. Technically that’s heavy metal and as we all know that obviously makes them satanic devil worshippers. Hmmm, that’s what I thought too. No, they didn’t like Peter Skellern either!”
That’s how bad this shit is getting! Cunts!
0
Agree broadly with you,RWAC,
I’m just looking at it in the way that I wouldn’t want any son of mine being raised by a pair of poofs.Or daughter by a pair of lesbians.
I know that it probably isn’t fair to suspect every homo of having ulterior motives,they probably don’t,but when all’s said and done,they’re deviants and even if they’re not predatory,they still set the wrong impression.
Just my opinion,and you’ve got a good point about the care system which has been a disgrace over the years,seems that it had,and probably still has,its share of perverts.
0
I don’t agree with same sex couples adopting coz its just unnatural.
If the opposite sex do nothing for them, why do they want to create a family ?
I know its only one example, but I watched a program where a lesbian couple had adopted a young boy, and guess what? He grew up bisexual.
As i say, i have no proof , but the boy had a girlfriend but said he also liked the cock. I think he was just trying g to fit in , what with all that homosexuals who hung around in house.
I may be wrong, but i may be right.
Talking of the gays, i was celebrating the birth of my daughter and the solitary poof in the bar (gay Dave) came over. I thought he was going to be congratulatory to me ,but no, the dirty cunt called me disgusting for being a “BREEDER”….
Well a split second later, my fist came the closest as it had ever been to a buttfucker as i decked the cunt with one soft punch to the delight of the everyone else……
1
What in the name of all that’s fucked is this compulsion of successive Governments to extend the twattish concept of the nanny state ?
Why feed into the milksop tendencies of the precious , let’s pretend we’re all nice and considerate fuck-wittery of insular , precious and insincere cunts?
As a non-smoker , I deplore the lack of pubs available for punters to enjoy a smoke and a drink – it used to be part of the social fabric.
In the workplace , non-smokers have to cover for those smokers who are forced to congregate outside for a fix , as even smoking areas inside have been abolished.
Is it any wonder we live in a society where those who regard themselves as liberally minded are truly becoming undemocratic fascists ?
0
Giving up smoking is fucking easy……I’ve done it lots of times.
Finally kicked the habit for good when I was on two lighters a day…
0
The smoking ban has killed both the pub and working men’s club trades…. Amazing how someone is allowed to get pissed or drink themselves to death, yet they’re not allowed to have a fag or a roll-up after working all day… A friend of mine left the UK during Blair’s time… He now lives in Portugal and when I was over there I asked him if he’d thought of coming back… He said he refused to live in a country where he can’t have a quiet pint and a roll-up in his local pub, and then he mentioned that even residents of Nazi Germany (and their occupied lands) were allowed to smoke, and that cunt Blair was (in some ways) worse than Hitler… Same pubs also have fruit machines where gambling is encouraged, but a cig or bit of baccy with a pint is not on?… What a load of crap…
Another bit of health and safety PC fascist bollocks… These student knobheads and known troublemaking pricks can get bladdered on sambucca and act like balloons: disturbing and hassling decent folk on a night out… Yet an ordinary working man or woman is forbidden to have a smoke… Say, an old bloke, who fought in the War, and also worked hard all his life… Doesn’t make a fuss about anything, but always looked forward to a pint and a smoke at his local of a weekend… But now it’s ‘You can’t do this! You can’t smoke there!’ This country is shite….
1
However the NHS are liable to be landed with the bill for an AIDS prevention pill for cunts who can’t even be arsed to wear johnny for casual sex encounters.
I would have thought giving these out to high risk folk (prossies and the like) in order to help them prevent catching it and passing it on to their Johns, and so on and so forth, would have made sence and would have saved a bit of money (in not having to treat the infected) in the long term.
However once the NHS is liable and it’s available on the nashy I think we all know who the main consumers will be!
Apparently it costs around £400 a month in order to enjoy the freedom of fucking about and jizzing everywhere (mana from heaven to the Blue Oyster Club brigade), but, on the nashy it’s the usual £8.40 prescription charge.
Who’s paying for that deficit then? Oh that’s right, everyone!
But whatever the fuck you do, don’t smoke indoors…
The world’s gone mad!
0
More BBC cuntery… The Blacks Only Broadcasting Corporation is now asking is it safe to be a Muslim in America….. They should ask New Yorkers and World Trade Centre employees about that one… Perhaps they should also ask if it’s safe to be a 12 year old girl in Rotherham, Bradford, Rochdale etc….
And where was the outcry and disgust from the leftist liberals and feminazi over that ‘Rape Melania’ sign?… Nowhere?… Funny, that… They’ve got upset, ‘outraged’ and ‘cried uncontrollably’ over less… Is this the start of a new campaign? ‘Threats of sexual violence and murder against white women don’t matter!’ has a ring to it….
0
Not that I would condone that sort of thing, but if there’d been a ‘Rape Michelle Obama!’ sign there would be ‘outrage’ and ‘offence’ lasting months on end, and the noise would be unbearable…. Nice to see how sexism and disregard for women is so selective these days.. White woman threatened (Mrs Trump): OK… Black woman (Gina Miller, Michelle Obama): Not OK… What lovely people these liberal types are….
If I was Old Don, and somebody had done that about my mrs, I would hunt the cunt down, make the cunt’s life hell and they’d sleep with one eye open for the rest of their life…
0
Your right complete hypocrites and sick violent fucks too https://ifunny.co/fun/vYg9eYmL4?gallery=tag&query=notmypresident#comments
0
Very true, TitSlapper… The B(lack)BC currently has an online headline that squeals ‘MIchelle Obama ‘Ape In Heels’ post sparks outrage…’ Yet a lefty liberal cunt holding up a sign demanding the rape of Melania Trump doesn’t get a mention… Hypocritical racist BBC bastards… And those Black Lives Matter lot are the most hateful and racist mob since the Ku Klux Klan… They are cunts…
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxQIMd5UUAACG9G.jpg:large
0
Surely we all know that the leftards only moan one way. If it’s a minority then they go apeshit on Twatter or Cuntbook. However Trumps old woman won’t get support because (a) she is married to Trump and (b) she is white.
Rape is rape and inciting rape is a crime irrespective of race. That doesn’t fit in with their view so it doesn’t matter.
Yes it does you cunts. Be consistent you wankers and don’t pick and choose due to colour. Fucking racists.
0
If social media (Facefook and Twatter) was banned with immediate effect, the PC lefty cunts and all their bollocks would eventually die a death… There would be no ‘revolution’ or ‘uprising’ or ‘taking to the streets’ (Katy Perry, you stupid fucking slag!)… There would be plenty of moaning and taking offence, but that’s all these cunts do: moan and take offence… At least 95% of these social media mongs wouldn’t be arsed to take any sort of real action… Take their toys away, and they’ll tantrum a bit and then move on to something else… But there’d be no ‘shoulder to shoulder’ stuff with these cunts… Most of the social media liberal mob do what they do out of convenience (because it’s there), pure narcissism (to get noticed and appear ‘cool’), to appear trendy and go along with the other cunts, and to keep up with the Joneses, as it were.. So as an actual physical threat, they are nothing… That would just leave celebrity cunts who use the TV and press for their gobshitery (Lily Mong, Benedict Cuntbercunt, Lineker etc), and with any luck, the backlash against those twats has already begun….
0
My dear old mom used to say of computers,and it still rings true…….”Garbage in…..garbage out”…………..Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
0
The fucking old stinking judges at the high Court need a cunting for trying to force prison officers back to work, maybe stick the old cunt judges in prison uniforms and let them spend time pandering after scumbags in prisons, these out of touch cunts at the high Court would sharp change there minds when they get stabbed. Any prison officers on strike reading this, please stay on strike and tell the out of touch cunts at the high Court to fuck off!!
0
Fear not.
Tide has turned.
Political correctness and the libtards that peddle it are finished.
Take a couple years but in five years time, these cunts will be hiding under rocks 🙂
0
Funnily enough I was listening to Simon Mayo’s teatime show on my travels when they had former Conservative MP, confirmed liberalist, and openly gay Matthew Parris on talking about his new book “Scorn” which is a collection of notable put downs from over the last few centuries.
That was all good and well – I actually quite like Matthew Parris as a political observer and commentator – until Simon asked if he felt uneasy being a liberal in this “growing age of right wing views”.
Now did he say that ordinary folk had due cause to be concerned having been bombarded with a liberal socialist view over the last 20 years or so. Or…did he say that he thought it was great being a libbo at this point in time in order to sway folk (fed up with being spoon fed liberalist ideals) with his liberal ideals?
No need for a second guess, eh!
He then went off on the usual anti-imigration, racist Brexiteers and Trump supporters mud slinging that we expect from cunts of this ilk.
Shame on you Matthew Parris! Given they were two democratic votes I’d have thought you would have at least said nothing rather than fulfilling the ABBC’s usual agenda!
I thought you were a decent bloke, you have gone down notably in my opinion of you. Not that you’ll care about my opinion because I’m not a libbo luvvie meejah whore like you! Cunt!
0
And I’ll never forget the first day of the smoking ban.
I was waiting at the bar when all of a sudden the bloke next to me dropped his guts, and I mean dropped them – the smell nearly took my breath away. “So this is the benefit of the smoking ban” I thought as my eyes stopped watering and the taste of vomit receded, “being able to smell other people’s farts while waiting for my Guinness”.
Thanks, Tony.
0
To borrow a sentiment from the comedy fraternity…..the by-product of smoking is of course smoke, which gets in my hair and clothes and makes them reek. I like drinking lager, the by-product of which is piss. So if I can piss on your hair and clothes, we’ll call it evens.
As I get older my eye sight is getting worse, but I think I’ll take up smoking which I believe will help. Why I hear you ask? Well, smokers must have terrific eye sight because only they can see those signs by the side of the road which say the road is their personal fucking ashtray. Cunts.
0
if you can’t smoke inside and there’s no ashtrays or sand-buckets outside the only choice is to chuck your fag in the road or dog it out on the pavement – no contest really
0
Smokers – yes, the fucking lot of you! – can eat shit and come back for seconds.
Feel sorry for them? Fuck right off, they are selfish, posion spewing cunts who care about little else other than their pathetic addiction. They should be fined for spreading their muck in the air and leaving their butts on the ground. If I had my way, they’d be lined up against the nearest wall and given one way tickets to oblivion…
CUNTS!
0
Fuck em. Disgusting habit. Shouldn’t even be allowed to stand outside the pub.
Might not get many likes reading the other comments but I’m sick of having to walk through a wall of smoke every time I enter a pub. And in the summer when you want to sit outside you can’t as all the cunts are out there puffing away.
Doing anything that affects other people’s enjoyment and health socks.
0
Sucks even. Socks are ok.
0