Use the Comment section below to write up your cunting nomination.
The site admins will periodically review the nominations and will either:
✔️ schedule it to be published immediately or at a later date, OR
❌ bin it for any number of reasons
Either way, your nomination will disappear from this page.
That’s how you’ll know it’s been reviewed, so don’t ask.
If you want your cunting nomination published, follow the fucking rules:
[1] Whenever possible include a link to a recognised news source or risk 🗑️.
[2] Unsubstantiated allegations against living people or institutions results in 🗑️.
[3] Too short (less than 5 lines) or too long (more than 50 lines) qualifies it for 🗑️.
[4] Pay attention to grammar, spelling, punctuation & spacing. Unreadable equals 🗑️.
[5] Respond appropriately to an admin comment within 2 days, otherwise it’s 🗑️.
Which leads us to a most important rule:
Do NOT ask questions or add comments to nominations unless:
➡️ specifically requested by an admin, or
➡️ you are seconding a nomination, or
➡️ you are the original nominator and are making a correction, or
➡️ you are adding a link at the request of the nominator or an admin
If you break this rule, you may be moderated indefinitely or possibly banned.
NOW LET’S GET CUNTING!
Allowing the state to control death is a nightmarish cunt – and a clear and present danger to us all.
Only the other day I was bemoaning the fact that there were so few truly macabre cunts to be nominated. However, this one is a corker. The sinisterly named “Omega – Journal of Death and Dying” has reported the publication of a Canadian paper “Government Economics of Expanding Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying to Vulnerable Populations and the Ethical Implications of Allowing the State to Control Death”
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00302228251323299
Apparently the Canadian Government could save CAD 1.273 trillion dollars by 2047 by encouraging the mentally ill and elderly to opt for death rather than palliative care.
These findings’highlight a need for ethical scrutiny” – no shit!
I suppose we can only hope that Rachel from Accounts does not find out about this wheeze this before 26 November.
5
Let’s add one to the Great Library of Cunts..
The BBC’s Executive Complaints Committee (hilarious in its own right) has rebuked newsreader Martine Croxall for going “off script” during an interview about heatwaves affecting,amongst others, pregnant “people”..
“The presenter said: “Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, says that the aged, pregnant people … women … and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions.”
The ECU said it considered Croxall’s facial expression laid it open to the interpretation that it “indicated a particular viewpoint in the controversies currently surrounding trans ideology.”
This just a day or two after the Daily Telegraph unveiled irrefutable evidence Panorama doctored a speech by President Trump to make it appear that he incited rioting.
A sick joke.
An untouchable Hard Left Cartel of Quisling Cunts.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3epwz08ewzo
6
Ed Davey M.P:
Davey who is as ugly as the grapes of wrath on Alan Carr’s battered arsehole is a very lucky man. By saying fuck all about anything important, and falling off boats and into water, he managed to obtain 72 seats at the last election, despite the fact he is a total moron and lightweight. He makes The Monster Raving Loony Party look sane. They are not as concerned about transbunderism and men in drag as the Lib Dems are.
Davey is scared of the Reform Party – just look at the list of fears and concerns below, but in a speech today (November 7th) he is going to urge that the FPTP voting system is changed before the next election because he fears that Reform could gain power with a small majority – in itself a ridiculous notion since he knows he will throw in his lot with the Labour party to defeat them. Indeed, if you are a quare loving, diversity loving, refugees are welcome here, knit your own Muesli imbecile, why not just vote Labour and cut out middleman Davey.
To be frank I am no great admirer of Reform – the party which knows it is promising far more than it can hope to deliver, and will ultimately disappoint its impatient admirers. To me, both labour and the Lib-Dems are the natural parties of opposition, and they should stay that way, but the sheer hypocrisy of “Sir” Ed (and what the fuck did he get the Knighthood for – services to piss-artists?) is staggering.
https://www.google.com/search?q=ed+davey+worried+about+reform&rlz=1CAFORO_enGB1085GB1085&oq=ed+davey+worried+about+reform&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRiPAjIHCAMQIRiPAtIBCDkyMTJqMGo0qAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
4
”Anti-black discrimination systemic in Met – report”
The bastards. And they have baroness baldy Lawrence to prove it. Because her son was killed by white cunts and there have been no black on black or black on white murders since. Because blacks dont do crime except when whitey’s racism forces them into it.
So, why on earth would the Met be discriminatory? We know blacks definitely dont do violent crime. Nor deal drugs. They dont carry knives. So why are they disproportionately represented in prisons?
Can only be racism.
And surely no fucker, such as say Baroness Baldy, makes a living out of victimhood.
Met racism. The cunts.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1lq711n2e2o
3
The Ignorance of French drivers.
She who will be obeyed and I went to Belgium for a few days. Driving through a smallish village we encountered a cunt trying and succeding to be a complete bellend.
He was at a junction and tried to exit the junction, I slammed the anchors on blocking the junction, Matey meanwhile was still fucking trying to occupy the space reserved by my front wing.
Realising that this would lead to a good kick in the gonads he stayed stationary. Due to a time honoured English custom towards the French during our occaisional disputes with said French types
Less than 300 metres later he overtook us like a bat out of hell ignoring the posted 30 km/h speed limit
A day later another wanker tried overtaking on the same stretch of road, again ignoring the 30km/h speed limit this time nearly taking out some poor cow on the opposite side of the road, narrowly missing us and the other woman. Bearing in mind it is a no overtaking zone as well.
In conclusion I would advise avoiding Bray Dunes at all costs. Imagine the hills have eyes set in France.
Much safer to go via Adinkirke. For those enquiring minds, yes beer brought and some baccy supplies as well.
2
The savings account offering a 50% bonus – with a catch.
I came across this little gem quite by accident, and the headline naturally appealed to me….a savings account offering a 50% bonus….with a catch? I thought, what’s the catch? Normally high return accounts only offer this if your have shitloads to save, and even then if you invest it for 10 years and you don’t touch it.
So, I watched our resident shirt lifter Martin Lewis explain to to me in the attached video what it’s all about. Apparently it’s only open to low income workers who are also on Universal Credit, whereby over a period of 2 years saving the government (ie..us, the taxpayer) will reward these savers with a 50% bonus of the highest amount they have saved in that 2 year period. So if you save a grand in the first year, then decide to remove all but a quid of it by the second year, us tax payers will give those on UC a bonus of £500!!
Now, forgive me but if you are drawing benefits from us hard working tax payers because you ‘have no money’ then surely you shouldn’t have enough ‘spare’ to save? And even if you have, wy the fuck are the tax payers paying such a high bonus for saving OUR money to recive it?
Bonkers….and a cunt.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cvg431zp41ro
2