Yet again, we have mad fuckers blowing themselves up on the streets of a European city in the name of their fanatical interpretation of the mindless cult of Islam. But, almost before the blood on those streets is dry, cunts like Simon Jenkins in the Guardian are writing crap about how the real problem is the West and its attitude towards the Middle East and the so-called Muslim community in Europe. Check out Comment is Free on the Guardian’s website and Voices at the Independent; they are both full of articles that basically blame “racism” or “Islamophobia” or Western foreign policy for the events in Brussels.
These attacks seem to be coming along with increasing frequency at the moment. But as soon as they do, “progressive” twats are out in force with the standard narrative – Islam is a religion of peace, not all Muslims are terrorists, it’s the West’s fault, blah, blah, fucking blah, ad bloody nauseum. Do these cocksuckers have a template that they cut-and-paste every time some micro-cocked Islamist blows himself up in the name of his imaginary friend?
I do not need to be told over and over again by “progressive” faggots that most Muslims are not terrorists. I fucking know that, I’m not a fucking retard. However, whilst it is clear that most Muslims are not terrorists, it is also clear that most terrorists (at the moment) are Muslims. This is a fact, it is not “racist” or “Islamophobic” to say so.
The problem all the apologists make is to confuse “Islam” (or even “Islamism”) with “Muslims” and they use these two words interchangeably. How many times must it be said that Islam is an IDEA and Muslims are PEOPLE, they are not the same thing. I have read the Koran from cover to cover and it is anything but a peaceful book. It is totally incoherent, repetitive and dull; with the constant theme being that you will go to Hell if you don’t slavishly follow Allah’s petty (and often arbitrary) rules. I simply could not find the parts of this mad book that “progressive” twats insist make Islam a “religion of peace.”
But “Islam” is not the same thing as “Muslim.” Muslims are people with the same strengths and weaknesses that non-Muslims have; they are not robots who have downloaded some software called Islam that controls and dictates their every action. Some Muslims are clearly violent and want to impose their childish ideas on the rest of us. Most Muslims, I’m sure, want to be left alone to look after their own families and live their own lives. Neither of these types of people means Islam is a peaceful religion; it just means that some people take Mo the kiddie-fiddler’s violent rantings more seriously than others.
What is racist is the way people are labelled as “Muslims” because of their ethnicity, particularly by “progressive” twats. Perhaps folks from MENA or parts of South Asia are mostly Muslim, but is that really their free choice? Or is it because of the oppressive nature of those societies, where not being Muslim (at least outwardly) can be a death sentence? Perhaps because people from certain ethnic minorities have been abandoned (by “progressive” twats) to the tender mercies of greasy-bearded paedophiles in the cause of identity politics that they have the “Muslim” identity forced on them? Or they have no way of escaping this oppressive ideology?
One way I do agree with the “progressive” twats is when they say that the majority of victims of ISIS et al are Muslims. Only I would broaden this idea to say that the majority of the victims of Islam itself are Muslims – women forced into abusive marriages and into wearing tents; young girls who have their genitals brutally mutilated; gaylords who are murdered; schoolchildren who are beaten for not banging their heads on the ground often enough or for forgetting some of Mo the kiddie-fiddler’s ravings. These are exactly the people we should be HELPING to escape from the mindless cult of Islam. But any ex-Muslim who dares raise any of these issues is immediately denounced as an “Islamophobe” or (hilariously) as a “racist” by – you guessed it – “progressive” twats.
I ask who the real racist is – the knuckle-dragging BNP skinhead who hates all “Pakis” and can’t tell the difference between a Muslim and a Sikh? Or the “progressive” twat in his zillion pound house in an all-white enclave of Islington who refuses to hold those funny brown people in their colourful clothes and their exotic religion to the same ethical standards as the rest of us?
I’m going to sign off now but I’m sure I’ll rant about the next apologist of Jihad I read after the next Islamist terrorist attack. See you next Friday probably…
Nominated by: Cunt’s Mate Cunt
Cunting of the week.
0
Really good cunting, anyone who apologises for these scum should take the next flight to Kabul and walk the streets with a placard reading “I’m a Western Christian and I bring you peace” and see how rapidly the peace loving Muslims welcome those cunts with being burnt alive.
But I think this cunting could be extended to religion as a whole. There is as much proof, physical or otherwise, that I have a 400 foot invisible rabbit living in my back garden who only I can see and who tells me all the truths of the world in return for my unflinching worship.
It boils down to the fact that the ISIS and their supporters will never win their “struggle”, whether we have the inclination to try and stop them or not. There is too few of them, too many of everyone else. Capitalism will not sit idly by while a backwards religion tries to eradicate profit and business from the world. Western governments and armies (By a country mile, bar China and Russia, the most powerful organisations on the planet) are not going to roll over and decide a spell under Islam might just work.
Maybe more to the point, the fact that within a few decades any money within the Middle East/Islamic nations is going to evaporate as they will have no oil and absolutely zero tradeable assets or skills the outside world will care about because they’re all too busy shagging their 13 year old nieces and living in fear of an imaginary pedophile who promises them virgins. Fucking creeps. On top of that 50% of their populations (the women) will jump at the chance to break free from the misogynistic nonsense. It will just become a sandier Africa, but without the machetes. Silly moron cunts.
0
I think the get out of jail “holly war clause” is the problem, to my understanding you can pretty much do whatever you like to whoever you like and as long as you die in holly war you jump the que of all the rational faith following people to sit at the right hand of your chosen god.
0
Brilliant rant! Islam is a huge problem and it needs to be stated as such.
0
Epic cunting. I’d also point out that each massacre is always followed by articles lamenting that someone has pulled a hijab, or a young muslim man is asking for hugs, so that the progressives can “prove” that “Islamaphobia” has forced these peace loving people to come over all Allah Akbar.
0
Well reasoned cunting.
Its time Islam was recognised as a cult, invented for political reasons. In this respect it is no more valid than scientology, mormonism or any other of the loony tunes that persist. However, even scientology doesn’t preach hatred and exclusion to the extent that these madmen (and they are men) go to.
And it should be recognised that orthodox Islam condones maimimg, slavery, suppression of women, public execution, death for apostasy and blasphemy.
So, not Islamic extremists, just everyday muslims.
0
I signed up just to say what a bloody marvellous cunting. Bravo! Islam is a cunting cult of foaming at the mouth women hating, goat loving, nut jobs that is the biggest threat to the Western way of life. Round them all up, send them to Islamacunt and let them slaughter each other, problem solved.
0