Use the Comment section below to write up your cunting nomination.
The site admins will periodically review the nominations and will either:
✔️ schedule it to be published immediately or at a later date, OR
❌ bin it for any number of reasons
Either way, your nomination will disappear from this page.
That’s how you’ll know it’s been reviewed, so don’t ask.
If you want your cunting nomination published, follow the fucking rules:
[1] Whenever possible include a link to a recognised news source or risk 🗑️.
[2] Unsubstantiated allegations against living people or institutions results in 🗑️.
[3] Too short (less than 5 lines) or too long (more than 50 lines) qualifies it for 🗑️.
[4] Pay attention to grammar, spelling, punctuation & spacing. Unreadable equals 🗑️.
[5] Respond appropriately to an admin comment within 2 days, otherwise it’s 🗑️.
Which leads us to a most important rule:
Do NOT ask questions or add comments to nominations unless:
➡️ specifically requested by an admin, or
➡️ you are seconding a nomination, or
➡️ you are the original nominator and are making a correction, or
➡️ you are adding a link at the request of the nominator or an admin
If you break this rule, you may be moderated indefinitely or possibly banned.
NOW LET’S GET CUNTING!
Dr. Anthony John Felton:
Let me present you with a typical school headmaster – an arrogant man who is good at dishing it out, but not so happy having to take it. Felton decided to attack his deputy with an offensive weapon, and inflicted injuries on him. This was is March 2025, now, just ten months later, the sanctimonious old cunt has been arrested, tried, imprisoned – and released!. Just imagine if he had been a lorryn driver or a factory worker. I am sure the would have been looking at a 3/5 year sentence, but poor old Felton, even with his derisory sentence, was shitting himself. “I was afraid I would be raped” (at 54 with a face like that – Christ he has a high opinion of himself!).
Thankfully, the old lags took to “sir” and gave him an easy time.
Given the ludicrously short sentence and the violence displayed by the old bugger, I wish some big black quare had taken a liking to him inside.
Two Tier sentencing in action:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37833341/headmaster-attacked-deputy-spanner-love-triangle-breaks-silence/
4
Potholes.
This is an ongoing issue and the absolute bugbear of any road user who has the misfortune to have to drive ( or be driven ) over these ploughed fields masquerading as roads.
https://www.timeslocalnews.co.uk/local-news/hundreds-of-kent-pothole-claims-are-unsuccessful-because-of-this-loophole/
Quite apart from the danger of a collision if someone unexpectedly jinks into your path trying to avoid one, there’s the issue of potentially expensive damage to your vehicle should you hit one.
Not to worry, you can always claim from the council can’t you?
Wrong! They have the perfect loophole.
You can’t claim if the pothole is
A. Scheduled for repair, or
B. Hasn’t been reported, so they didn’t know about it.
Got you coming and going, haven’t they? How do you disprove either scenario?
As a matter of interest, the Telegraph has published an article about this, which is behind a pay wall on line, but mentioned that those whose claims were successful are those on two-wheeled transport who suffered significant injury.
3
Unrelated Stories Being Passed Off As Subject Relevant News.
These days I have only a mild passing interest in football and try to avoid news in general. However, I clicked onto the Telegraph Football webpage to see what’s going on. There was a bit about Man Utd fans wanting a no confidence vote in Sir Jim Radcliffe. OK. Man City to pay £60M release clause to sign Semenyo. OK. Some news about the starting lineups for the Woolwich Nomads vs. Murdering Scum Scousers. Fair enough.
But what’s this? Mini headline reads, “Coote avoids prison after child sex offence conviction”. That’s not football news. The fact Coote used to be a Premier League referee is irrelevant. I don’t want to be exposed to stories about sex pests. That shit should be on the main news section, not the football section.
Another mini-headline, “Gabby Logan replaced during Match of the Day following death of father Terry Yorath”. Terry Yorath (proper footballer) passing away is football news related. I get that part. His gargoyle daughter leaving the set of some has been BBC shit show is not news. Why do we need to know she left the set to deal with a death in the family? We don’t. Again, it’s not football news, FFS.
This kind of shit goes on all the time. On the BBC Football webpage there’ll often be references to absolute nobodies but related to a high profile club. Bit confusing. Oh wait, it’s about women’s football not proper football. Now the BBC in their infinite wisdom have these tabs/sections on their Football webpage:
– Scores & Fixtures
– Tables
– Gossip
– Transfers
– Top Scorers
– Women
– European
– All Teams
– League & Cups
– Quizzes
Now if some cunt reporter at the BBC wants to write up some crap about some nobody tart who plays for a woman’s team, take a wild fucking guess which section that “story” should be in.
Is it so unreasonable to have football news on the Football page, cricket news on the Cricket page, rugby news on the Rugby page and so on? And have the unrelated crap on the main news page where it’s more easily avoided?
1
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football
0