Nominations


Use the Comment section below to write up your cunting nomination.

The site admins will periodically review the nominations and will either:

✔️ schedule it to be published immediately or at a later date, OR
❌ bin it for any number of reasons

Either way, your nomination will disappear from this page.
That’s how you’ll know it’s been reviewed, so don’t ask.

If you want your cunting nomination published, follow the fucking rules:

[1] Whenever possible include a link to a recognised news source or risk 🗑️.
[2] Unsubstantiated allegations against living people or institutions results in 🗑️.
[3] Too short (less than 5 lines) or too long (more than 50 lines) qualifies it for 🗑️.
[4] Pay attention to grammar, spelling, punctuation & spacing. Unreadable equals 🗑️.
[5] Respond appropriately to an admin comment within 2 days, otherwise it’s 🗑️.

Which leads us to a most important rule:
Do NOT ask questions or add comments to nominations unless:
➡️ specifically requested by an admin, or
➡️ you are seconding a nomination, or
➡️ you are the original nominator and are making a correction, or
➡️ you are adding a link at the request of the nominator or an admin
If you break this rule, you may be moderated indefinitely or possibly banned.

NOW LET’S GET CUNTING!

3 thoughts on “Nominations

  1. Count Binface is a cunt.

    This unfunny Cunt – sorry Count -has been “entertaining” at election nights for a number of years now. Unfortunately his lack of success now has him held up by the CONservatives, LIEbour, Lib Dems (ha, ah, ha) and Greens (Fuck Off .. really? Yes really, just Fuck Off!) as a hero of democracy:

    https://dailysceptic.org/2026/07/13/in-end-stage-yookay-the-regime-satirises-you/

    Maybe Binface will beat Farage. If so, it will be exactly what the Mother-fucker of all Parliaments deserves. A cunt with a bin on his head sitting on the green benches.

    Fuck right off.

  2. The BBC’s weather scaremongering is a cunt.
    Yes, it’s probably been too hot for many of us but, by and large, we managed to cope.
    But according to the BBC, the warm weather means death and destruction.
    Not content with their recent claim that the weather was the cause of deaths to teenagers by drowning, they’ve now upped the ante considerably.
    “More than 2,700 people may have died in exceptional May and June heatwaves in England and Wales”.
    Well. Did they or didn’t they?
    The article doesn’t have explicit post mortem evidence, but is based on non proven theory.
    It gets even worse.
    “UK heatwave to intensify in second week as wildfires burn across UK”.
    Because vegetation naturally self combusts because of climate change and it has absolutely nothing to do with the possibility of discarded cigarettes or rogue bbq’s.
    And finally, this utter drivel.
    “Why heatwaves hit women harder”
    So now it appears that the weather is sexist because wimminz have hormones and, as everybody knows, men don’t.
    Fucking grow up you bunch of bedwetting cunts!

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czx5zy82n7no

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/c0jyx16ww8jo

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gyp1knzzxo

  3. No shit, Sherlock!

    Here’s a headline from BBC News that is either stunning in it’s naivety, or a fine example of how things are being dumbed down further and further on a daily basis .

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg53951e9z1o

    Really, criminal gangs responsible for illegal dumping? There’s me thinking that it was all down to the vast army of DIY home improvers out there.

    Who writes these headlines? Is it the night editors daughter, on work experience?

    Unfortunately, this kind of thing is not only confined to the BBC news, some headlines I’ve seen recently, particularly by the Daily Suppress, are just as bad, or even worse.

    There was one recently that read something like ” Burnham to close residents allotments ” , with the crowning of the new King looking fair to take place shortly, the implication was that Andy Burnham intends to take away the places we keep our whippets and pigeons.

    Not so, it was referring to some place called Burnham on Sea.

    It’s shabby, shoddy, lazy and downright deceitful. Do better!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *