Nominations


Use the Comment section below to write up your cunting nomination.

The site admins will periodically review the nominations and will either:

✔️ schedule it to be published immediately or at a later date, OR
❌ bin it for any number of reasons

Either way, your nomination will disappear from this page.
That’s how you’ll know it’s been reviewed, so don’t ask.

If you want your cunting nomination published, follow the fucking rules:

[1] Whenever possible include a link to a recognised news source or risk 🗑️.
[2] Unsubstantiated allegations against living people or institutions results in 🗑️.
[3] Too short (less than 5 lines) or too long (more than 50 lines) qualifies it for 🗑️.
[4] Pay attention to grammar, spelling, punctuation & spacing. Unreadable equals 🗑️.
[5] Respond appropriately to an admin comment within 2 days, otherwise it’s 🗑️.

Which leads us to a most important rule:
Do NOT ask questions or add comments to nominations unless:
➡️ specifically requested by an admin, or
➡️ you are seconding a nomination, or
➡️ you are the original nominator and are making a correction, or
➡️ you are adding a link at the request of the nominator or an admin
If you break this rule, you may be moderated indefinitely or possibly banned.

NOW LET’S GET CUNTING!

21 thoughts on “Nominations

  1. Failing to appear in court is a total cunt.

    I recognise that Modern Britain is a soft as shit disaster zone but if any govt,even this present cesspit of vermin,wanted a boost in the “opinion polls” ,they would ensure that the accused particularly those facing the most serious charges are brought to the Dock,by force if necessary.

    In the case highlighted in the link we are dealing with an attempted mass murderer,thug and all-round first rate blek cunt..

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c997ng7zx3xo

    Knock fuck out the wicked swine,drag into into court,find it guilty at once then hang it outside.

    All done in a day,which certainly doesn’t suit the Legal Profession Gravy Train.

    What a farce,again.

  2. Fuck me here we go again.
    Non UK National saved from deportation due to potential mental harm and risk of drug addiction if repatriated to his home land.

    So in a snip.

    He had received cautions for shoplifting and bringing a bladed weapon into school, for which he was suspended from school in 2015.
    After his suspension in 2015, a GP referred Izhan to support from ADHD services (wonder what nationality that Doctor was).

    Despite his suspension, First-Tier Tribunal Judge Samina Iqbal (lets not speculate where he is from either) previously found that Izhan was “fully immersed in his school life” because he had attended primary and secondary school in the same city, played rugby for the school team and was a “star pupil”.

    Although he was also disruptive, suspended and ultimately expelled from school, the judge concluded that his ADHD, PTSD and vulnerability meant he would face “very significant obstacles to integration” if he was deported to Pakistan.

    whilst

    Dr Arvin Gupta (again lets not speculate), a consultant psychiatrist, gave evidence that while Izhan probably had ADHD, he also had a “mental and behavioural disorder due to the use of [cannabis]”.

    however he had graduated, well in the life of crime!

    An immigration tribunal also ruled that Muhammad Izhan, who was jailed for dealing class A and B drugs, could stay in the UK because his removal to Pakistan would “have a negative impact on his mental health”.

    The tribunal also said there was a risk he would use drugs if he was removed to his home country.

    Izhan was sentenced to 30 months in prison for dealing in a “sophisticated” drugs ring, which he joined because of his “inability to properly regulate his ADHD”, the court was told.

    From what I can see, someone who is very damaging to this Country is being allowed to stay in it, because the protection of their rights and safety is held above those around him?

    read the full article here.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/12/01/pakistani-drug-dealer-deportation-star-pupil-school/?utm_source=newsshowcase&utm_medium=gnews&utm_campaign=CDAqDggAKgYICjCbpHowwqoJMO-21gQ&utm_content=rundown&gaa_at=g&gaa_n=AWEtsqeEM-FJWEZUCuTN0l-FdiptfDo9MpF1_uIVJ7gXoaVjIAfGBMeM3-329HlGN0RW6T1bJUIPgh22CWAT&gaa_ts=692f019d&gaa_sig=Qs4aXgt4E1sliVm8-Q4wtwzWGUpMrPynnTiWhjUF49ztaLaNNDQo2r_Y437FtxrE-6T14b3GTS6gb3Q55ba8HA%3D%3D

    now go down to your shed and scream!

  3. The DVSA and the mysterious disappearing driving test slots.

    I saw this and thought what the fuck?

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0l7ddg2np6o.amp

    Now, I took and passed my driving test on the 6th May 1976. Booking a test on-line was not an option. I can’t quite remember what the process was, but I’m fairly sure it involved proving your identity.

    So I asked Younger. Apparently, there are two booking portals, one for ordinary people, and one for accredited driving instructors. Somehow, the second portal has been manipulated, or used inappropriately, hence the theatre ticket scalpers version of driving tests, where slots are being offered for up to £500.

    The DVSA are supposedly closing the portal, or at least introducing stricter controls. Yeah, ok but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

    I almost feel sorry for the poor sod in the link, but my advice, give up driving.

  4. sorry this is a direct copy and paste but very acurate.

    should the police disclose the ethnicity and background of suspects in high-profile crimes, and how soon should they reveal this information? In the year since the Southport unrest – in which migrant hotels were attacked after online claims the attacker had been an asylum seeker – the British state has had to ask itself this question.

    While the ethnicity and nationality of criminal suspects were routinely talked about in the 1980s, since the 1999 MacPherson report into ‘institutional racism’ in the Met, with its concerns racial stereotyping, the police have become far more reluctant to do so. When it came to Southport, for days we were only allowed to know that the suspect was ‘a 17-year-old male from Banks in Lancashire, who is originally from Cardiff’. In the end, this unspeakable atrocity was carried out by someone who clearly did not view himself as part of British society. The sense that officialdom hadn’t been quite straight with the public about the perpetrator – a second generation Rwandan refugee – only fostered public anger and mistrust.

    Why, when terrible events happen, don’t they want officialdom to dispel any rumour or speculation by swiftly and calmly setting out the facts?

    Jonathan Hall KC, the government’s advisor on terrorism, is among those to have since said this was a mistake and to call for reform: ‘In the digital era, if the police do not take the lead in providing clear, accurate and sober details about an attack like Southport, others will. Social media is a source of news for many people and near-silence in the face of horrific events of major public interest is no longer an option.’ In April, the Home Affairs Committee report on the Southport disorder, without citing Hall, reached a similar conclusion, arguing that an information ‘vacuum’ had undermined public confidence.

    David Olusoga’s Empire exposes the BBC’s history problem
    When a car was driven into a parade of Liverpool supporters in May, it initially seemed to many like an Islamist terror incident, with Tommy Robinson swiftly calling the ramming a ‘suspected terror attack’ on X. This was an opportunity for Merseyside Police, the same force that had been so slow with the details about Rudakubana, to adopt a more transparent approach. Within two hours of the incident, the police disclosed that the suspect was a ‘53-year-old white British man from the Liverpool area’, before giving a full press conference later that evening. Despite the shock at what had happened, no riots followed.

    In August, the National Police Chiefs’ Council has issued new guidance pushing forces to be more upfront, and now these changes have gone out for consultation. The NPCC recommends that in ‘high profile or sensitive’ crimes, police forces ‘should confirm the nationality and/or ethnicity of the suspect or defendant… where there is:

    A policing purpose in doing so.

    A related risk or impact on public safety such as rising community tension.

    Mis- or disinformation leading to community tension.

    A significant level of media or social media interest.’

    At a time when concerns about immigration, crime and terror are higher than ever, it is only right that officials are upfront with the public when such incidents occur.

    But now, elements of the left-wing Blob are fighting a rearguard action against the truth. Led by the Runnymede Trust, 63 activist organisations have sent an open letter to Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and chief constable Gavin Stephens, the NPPC chair, urging the ‘divisive guidance to be revoked with immediate effect’. Signatories include migrant advocate organisations, race charities, feminist campaign groups and the likes of the Muslim Council of Britain (which the last Labour government cut ties with). Over at LinkedIn, campaigners are encouraging each other respond to the consultation to derail the changes (readers can have their own say here).

    There is a certain irony about this campaign against transparency. After all, it is precisely these kinds of left-wing organisations who usually complain loudest about the threat of so-called ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ and their supposed power to whip people up into a frenzy. This is the narrative we have heard about the Southport disorder ever since it began, which is very often used to justify internet censorship, despite online rumours playing only a minor role, if any, in that unrest. These are the types who will dismiss any and every right-wing talking point online as a ‘dangerous’ populist falsehood or the deliberate propaganda of ‘Russian bots’. So why, when terrible events happen, don’t they want officialdom to dispel any rumour or speculation by swiftly and calmly setting out the facts?

    Perhaps it’s because the facts often have the unfortunate habit of telling the wrong story. For the signatories, the problem is that such disclosures risk ‘fostering a dangerous and misleading conflation between race, migration, and criminality’. They complain that while the guidance was billed as an ‘attempt to dispel misinformation’, it will have the effect of ‘reviving a focus on race and migration status’. The letter cites a Runnymede Trust ‘snapshot analysis’ of media articles from mid-August to mid-November 2023 versus the same period since the NPCC change this year, which ‘shows an increase in the use of descriptors such as certain foreign nationality, asylum status and ethnicity in crime reporting’. The term ‘asylum seeker’ is now being used in articles about serious crime five times more frequently, it says. The ‘extremely dangerous’ result is to ‘encourage the public to perceive ethnicity and migration status as significant factors in the commission of crime.’

    But the public are drawing these links because of real events, not just how they are reported. If asylum seekers are being linked with serious crime more frequently, that’s because of the innocent victims asylum seekers have murdered in cold blood in just the past year, like Rhiannon Whyteand Gurvinder Johal. Indeed, while the signatories insist there is ‘no credible academic evidence’ of high migrant crime rates (as if such research would ever be commissioned), Police National Computer data suggests that 26 per cent of sexual assault on women last year were committed by foreign nationals, with another 8 per cent committed by offenders of ‘unknown’ nationality.

    The signatories complain that the new disclosure regime ‘contravenes longstanding norms’. In this at least they are correct. On migration, multiculturalism and crime, the previous system of official euphemism, omerta and polite fiction is today collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions. But that can only be a good thing. After decades of being betrayed, the public rightly no longer trust the powers that be. In our fractious age, they will accept nothing of short of the truth.

  5. Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio *

    Who?

    Well apparently, this year’s “Spotify Wrapped” (me neither) has been released, giving fans/idiots a personalised summary of their listening habits over the last year.

    The streaming giant said/alleged that Puerto Rican star Bad Bunny (see * above) was `the world’s most-played artist of 2025`, with more than 19.8 billion streams.

    His `acclaimed` album Debí Tirar Más Fotos, which embraces his island’s musical heritage**, was also the year’s biggest album – paving the way for him to perform at next year’s Super Bowl half time show. Whatever the fuck that is.

    ** I`m guessing drugs cartels, corrupt government, national debt crisis and widespread poverty, issues with infrastructure (especially power and roads), and massive violent gang crime epidemics plus the island is also vulnerable to natural disasters like hurricanes and earthquakes would all be quite high up on that list of cultural things to [c]rap about.

    Anyway, to save any cunters from projectile vomiting by providing any link to this cunt, I`m providing a link to the Goodies` Funky Gibbon song which I`m sure he`d cover quite admirably.

    Give me an “ooo!” … give me another “ooo!” … and one more “ooo!” …
    Now put `em together and what`s that spell ??? …

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXq8rELhUkw&list=RDpXq8rELhUkw&start_radio=1

    🐒🥜

  6. Uninvited guests to French swimming pools.

    Imagine the scene,dear reader.

    Monsieur Le Patrick is sat out by his pool,enjoying a large bowl of frogs legs,when some inconsiderate cunts gatecrash his garlic joy by driving their car through his wall and into his swimming pool..

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1m8g5x1xmko

    I’m sure it had him reaching for the brandy,especially as he should assume the occupants of the car are North African cunts without any type of insurance.

    Anyway,they all drowned so it’s an overall win for the cunt.

    Zut alors indeed.

  7. Tranny Madness (Continued)

    Allow me to present to cunters a further installment in a new series entitled ‘Tranny Madness’. This is the cautionary tale of one Ryan Haley, who’s been banged up after being found guilty of a sexual assault on a woman who was thirteen at the time of the incident.

    Unsavoury but not particularly unusual you might think, but here’s where it all starts to get a bit weird. Swivel-eyed loony Haley (see pic in the link) is now a cock in a frock, calls himself ‘Natalie Wolf’, and apparently refuses to accept the verdict handed out at Newcastle Crown Court, on the basis that there’s a conspiracy against him/her/hem/it whatever.

    ‘Natalie’ initially claimed that the jury had been tampered with to offer up a prejudicial verdict, then went further, claiming that the police, legal representatives, the jury and the judge had all been hypnotised (by aliens perhaps?). It also stated that it had ‘brain damage’; mention was also made of a ‘personality disorder’ and (you guessed it) ‘mental health issues’. No fucking shit Sherlock.

    It will come as no surprise that the judge rejected the conspiracy claims out of hand, gave our girl three and a half years in the slammer, and placed it on the sex offender’s register for good measure. So enjoy your time in the clink ‘Natalie’. Our prisons having been captured by the woke mentality, I’m sure that the screws will ensure that you’re properly supplied with tampons and eye liner.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq8dky7qv8qo

  8. Natalie Wolf is a cunt, isn’t HE.
    This story only goes to confirm that most, if not all trans cunts are mentally deranged.
    Apparently, this king size cunt was convicted of sexual assault on a 13 year old girl.
    Not happy with his conviction, he claims that his victim “ hypnotised” the police, judge and jury to convict him.
    A scarier looking cunt I’ve yet to see dear cunters. Watcha thank?

    https://www.breitbart.com/pre-viral/2025/12/03/trans-pervert-who-sexually-assaulted-13-year-old-girl-claims-jury-was-hypnotized-into-convicting-him/

  9. Ineffectual laws heaped upon Ineffectual laws..

    “Ofcom has told the BBC it has never heard from a pōrn company it has fined £1m for failing to comply with the UK Online Safety Act.”

    So they didn’t respond and fined them a further £50,000..

    That they will never pay but it keeps penpushing cunts in a job and let’s the uncooked sausage that is the PM waffle on about protecting (?) young people.

    The purveyors of pořn offer a service,I’ve never heard of any teenage lad being forced to log onto a pořn website against their will,hormones dictate behaviour at that age and they will find a way to do “extensive research”..

    Anyhow the company that faces the ire of Ofcom is registered to an address in Belize,where I assume nobody gives a heavily regulated fuck about the UK govts fines.

    No doubt Ofcom will be writing a strongly worded letter to the govt of Belize about this calumny and in 200 years hence will still be awaiting a response.

    But at least our govt have taken action!!

    The hopeless puritanical cunts.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c93nll07z3go

  10. The mental health issue.

    The government is looking into the mental health issue almost 2 million eligible for work people are currently claiming benefits and unable to work which is also causing a back log on mental health services.
    You know who I blame?
    Maggie,
    Yes I am going to call out Maggie on this one, my mother used to work at a local Loony bin, she was one of the OT staff there, then the “Human rights bill” came in and well it became against their human rights to work and it all stopped.
    So to give you an understanding mental health hospitals ran almost tangent to prison service facilitates, in the fact inmates receive pocket money and paid work, they also had subsidised shops.
    so the pay of say £3.00 a week would buy a couple of packs of fags and coffee ect.
    Any way with the “Human rights bill” manufacture in these establishments, that helped fund them closed.
    The units became a tax burden and were closed (like convalescent homes, wonder why the NHS has bed blocking?) the properties sold and “Care in the community” was rolled out.
    so lets fast forward to now.
    if you pretend, or duplicate any mental health issue you get to stay at home, the threat of the loony bin no longer exists.
    The men in the white coats will not be taking you away (they were made redundant) you can sit at home and get enhanced pay-outs for doing so.
    So Mr hilter sort of pushed things with his final solution, but fuck me Loony bins were a major deterrent and probably would have stemmed the mental health crisis we now face.

  11. Irritating Words and Expressions

    A first world problem perhaps, but the persistent use of certain words and expressions continues to drive me up the wall.

    Politicians are bad for this; remember good ol’ Gordon Brown and his ‘hard-working families’? Well what about Local Government Secretary Steven Reed letting us know recently that the government is ‘minded’ to delay some mayoral elections until 2028? ‘Minded’ for fuck’s sake? This sounds like politico Newspeak from the 90s. I’m surprised the cunt didn’t say that there’s an ‘overarching’ need for the delay. Let me be clear on this; moving forward, it’s not a good look. The optics are awful.

    Another bastard is when there’s some awful incident which leaves people in a bad way. I wish they’d just report that victims are in a serious or critical condition, but no; we always get the stupidly melodramatic ‘fighting for their lives’. Then when some figure who’s in the public eye pops their clogs, inevitably, ‘tributes pour in’. Really? To where, exactly? Oh, and when anybody has to say sorry for anything, the apology, we’re told, is always a ‘grovelling apology’.

    Has anybody ever patronised you by promising to consider your point of view, when you know they couldn’t give a fuck? Maybe you’ve been at a work meeting or something when some HR pencilneck promised to ‘take that on board’, but of course you know they’ll forget it as soon as they’re out the door. I ‘literally’ used to die at that one. And I’ll bet that anyone reading this has at some point heard ‘no offence but…’. Yep, that person’s about to tell you that you’re a cunt.

    Oh lord, fucking Americanisms. I loathe them, my bad. Come on dudes, I’m sure you can step up to the plate on this one. Get going already you guys. Turn a few nouns into verbs while you’re at it; wonder if there’s any chance that England might be able to medal at the next World Cup? We could work this up into a whole season.

    So, so there you go. Let’s hear your own pet hate words and expressions. It’s deliverable. Be empowered by IsAC; it’s open 24/7, just reach out. Unpack it. Touch base. And merry Chrimbo while you’re at it. Amazeballs.

  12. Giving your cat an antibiotic tablet.

    Required:
    The patience of a saint.
    Elbow length gardening gloves ( the kind you wear when removing brambles/nettles.
    A drawstring bag, preferably heavy duty.

    Method:
    Lull cat into a sense of false security and attempt to feed tablets.
    Apply antiseptic to clawed arms. Put on gardening gloves.
    Corner cat, stuff in bag, tighten drawstring.
    Loosen drawstring until cat pokes head out,
    Retighten drawstring.
    Attempt to force tablets into cats mouth.
    Try again, and again, and again.

    Answer door. Explain to police officer you are not torturing a baby, or a cat, or anything at all.

    Give up. Release cat

    Take cat to vets daily for next 10 days for injections.

    £679, and counting.

    • If I may add to this cunting, the benefit of my experience with the Common Moggie and its inherent greediness.

      Put the whole pill into some cheese spread such as Primula, cat laps it up, job done and arms not looking as if you’ve been attacked by Freddie Kruger.

      Puttin’ the freshness back into pet care.

  13. I give you the next big thing in cultural enrichment, paan spitting.

    This disgusting habit is rife in the London areas of Richmond and Kensington.
    Only joking it’s all over Wembley and Harrow, literally.
    And we all know what low IQ species is also all over that area.

    But good news brent council have put up signs warning people that fines will be implemented on perpetrators..

    Most likely in English, so none of the locals will understand.
    £30,000 a year it costs to clean up.
    So maybe instead of fines, which will never happen, make the dirty cunts clean up the mess with their tongues.

    Whats next,open aired defecating in the public streets.
    Still these people are as British as me and you, well that’s what that cross eyed pàķi home secretary told us.

    Brent Council in paan-spitting crackdown – BBC News https://share.google/j5HrEdmXHC5i7DVO6

  14. The disgrace that is Racist Booze.

    Having a nice drink is one of life’s little pleasures you might think,a nice glass of wine or two,a few pints in the local..

    You fucking bigot!

    Haven’t you considered how our “multicultural friends” might feel after necking 10 pints of cider?

    Well you should….Navraj Singh sought help in Bradford before moving to Birmingham, but found Asian people were underrepresented at services in both cities.

    “If you don’t see someone who looks like you then you might feel this place isn’t for me,” he said.

    Recovery meetings were often held in churches, he said, but he wanted a religiously neutral place and to move away from stereotypes.

    “Shame and stigma are universal,” he said. “It’s not specific to the South Asian community.”

    Indeed,but there’s more..it turned this yound lady a funny colour as well..

    “Corrina’s addiction began in her late teens in Worcester.

    “I saw friends at school drinking and I wanted to join in, I wanted to be ‘normal’. But my parents would say ‘that’s not what Indian girls do’,” she said.

    Describing a childhood “identity crisis”, she said: “I felt very ugly, and I thought that’s because I’m brown.”

    So put down that pint and reflect on what “support” our goat fucking chums might need.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj0e317z712o

    For fucks sake.

  15. David Lammy

    And the decision to remove the right of trial by jury for offenses that will result in sentences of three years, or less.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crk76z3n56xo.amp

    Now, this has somewhat put the cat amongst the pigeons when it comes to law students hoping to become barristers ( no, not baristars, they make coffee at Costa, et al )

    So much so, that some are considering training as solicitors, instead. Just what the market needs, loads of solicitors .

    Maybe they can entertain you with their experience in trying to find a job in their field while they make you a mochafrappachino?

    As an aside, although I find the photo of Lammy wearing a sheep pelt amusing, it diverts from the seriousness of his proposal. This is yet another attempt to erode British traditions, and should be resisted as strongly as possible.

Leave a Reply to Sheikh_Anvakh Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *