Nominations

Use the Comment section below to write up your cunting nomination.

The site admins will periodically review the nominations and will either:

βœ”οΈ schedule it to be published immediately or at a later date, OR
❌ bin it for any number of reasons

Either way, your nomination will disappear from this page.
That’s how you’ll know it’s been reviewed, so don’t ask.

If you want your cunting nomination published, follow the fucking rules:

[1] Whenever possible include a link to a recognised news source or risk πŸ—‘οΈ.
[2] Unsubstantiated allegations against living people or institutions results in πŸ—‘οΈ.
[3] Too short (less than 5 lines) or too long (more than 50 lines) qualifies it for πŸ—‘οΈ.
[4] Pay attention to grammar, spelling, punctuation, spacing. Unreadable equals πŸ—‘οΈ.
[5] Do not add comments to nominations unless specifically requested by an admin.
[6] Stop using the Nominations page to ask for things not to be nominated. Use the Contact Us page. That’s what it’s there for, otherwise πŸ—‘οΈ

 

Which leads us to a most important rule:
Respond appropriately to an admin comment within 2 days or guess what happens.
That’s right. It goes in the πŸ—‘οΈ.

LET’S GET CUNTING!

5 thoughts on “Nominations

  1. Censorship by Stealth

    *Deadline Brussels, 16th April 2024*

    The National Conservatism Confererence is about to get into full swing, with speeches from the likes of Nigel Farage and Suella Braverman scheduled. Suddenly a horde of Brussels plod appears, and shuts the gathering down on the orders of local mayor Emir Kir (bootiful Belgian name that).

    It appears that Mr Kir thinks that the conference constitutes some form of threat to public order or safety, hence his decision. What exactly does he expect? That the delegates will use the meeting as a launching pad for a putsch? That the complacent burghers of Brussels will be so outraged at the presence of ‘the far right’* in town that they’ll forego their beer and sausages and take to the streets?

    Nope, let’s make no mistake. Kir tried this trick because he wanted to shut down the voicing of opinions he doesn’t agree with, and the ‘public order’ justification was an excuse that’s as weak as water. This was nothing less than an attempt at censorship by stealth, and it was capricious and insidious.

    Luckily this crude attempt to shut down free speech was quickly seen for what it was, with the Belgian PM referring to it as ‘unconstitutional’, and overnight the courts have ruled that such a ban was indeed unlawful.

    Nevertheless the fear remains that this sort of procedure will creep slowly upon us; ‘no you can’t speak, you’re a threat to public order and safety. And by the way, we’re taking you into “protective custody” for your own good’. Oh, and judging from the sneering among opposition MPs in the Commons, this Stasi-like reaction in Brussels was deemed a good idea.

    Censorship ‘in the interests of the people’; coming soon to a Labour Party near you?

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13318349/nigel-farage-comapres-cancel-culture-soviet-union-conference.html

    *Yes them again. Mr Kir’s choice of words not mine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *