Grammarly. God, this company is annoying.
Their adverts are annoying, their encouragement and perpetuation of laziness when it comes to spelling is annoying, the fact they’re trying to convince you to pay a small fortune for something the likes of Word/Libra/OpenOffice already do, is annoying.
Fuck these cunts.
Nominated by The Rt Hon Earl Opinionated de Cunt
I can’t stand their You Tube adverts, which invariably features some matronly pseudo-intellectual American woman, with big glasses, or a “person of colour” also usually a pseudo intellectual windbag.
I would give them the Peloton Prize for a prime example of a useless poncing company dedicated to the vanity of self important fuckers who have more money than sense.
13
Wether to split the infinitive? To boldly go might not be grammatically correct but it is artistically. Better than to go boldly or boldly to go.
7
“Castrated ram to split the infinitive?”
Eh? Oh,,, this thread’s about anal sex…I see.
4
My experience is that women who wear big glasses love anal sex.
Perhaps, then, Laura Pidcock’s big glasses are an advert for a hulking great chode in her arsehole.
Same goes for Layla Moron.
Probably.
12
This is what I like about this site.
Expert analysis based on real life experience.
Good luck with your ongoing research.
Good morning.
17
And Christopher Biggins.
11
Good morning all.
MNC, you have confirmed my point exactly. Also adding Elton John, who is famously fond of having big fat one in his chocolate tunnel.
5
If quizzed, I reckon Sue Perkins and Su Pollard are both partial to a bit of tradesman’s entrance shenanigans.
10
It before or after bum oil is applied to Soup Erkins?
2
Janet Street Porter, you ain’t sticking your cock in her mouth for sure.
9
Good Morning, New week, new challenges.
The problem with Janet is that crap comes out of both orrifices.
6
Think your right mate.
If specsavers hadnt prescribed massive glasses mr Biggins would have been happily married with grown up children now.
He should seek legal advice.
8
We shouldn’t leave out Rebecca Long-Bailey. McDonnell is much taken with her – perhaps some late night trips down the chocolate escalator?
5
You do realise, Diane Abbott sometimes wears specs!
Who the fuck would want to take her up the brown bag?
3
Plus, she only wears specs to make herself look more clever than she really is, which isn’t saying very much at all!
4
I think that abbot lady she wears different glasses depending on the situation.
Her maths glasses might need an adjustment, though.
2
Anal sex…?
Could it be that’s why I find fit birds wearing glasses with black frames virtually irresistible?
You learn something new about yourself every day on ISAC.
Doesn’t explain my other predilection for birds having lighted tabs hanging from their luscious lips.
3
That snooker player Dennis Taylors big glasses.
3
Based on this thesis old Ronnie Corbett could accommodate a hefty pork sword then. I’ve always thought Corbett was a right cunt based on Ronnie Barker penning every sketch.
0
‘And I’m guessing that the inversion itself is emphatic, as in “Did he ever!”, rather than signaling an ironic self-addressed question. That is, the meaning is “I really don’t like that”, not “Is it the case that I don’t like that?”
‘The linguistic question is, why was “Do I not like that” an appropriate and resonant response to an opposing team’s score?
The subject-auxiliary inversion of do separate from not is an archaic feature apparently preserved in the kind of English that Taylor grew up with:
Very interesting.
2
Linguistic? Not a fan of pasta.
Grammarly bread either.
Whatve you got me for Christmas Miles?
Know its rude to ask, but there you go.
4
You’ll have to wait till Christmas morning Miserable. But I can say one thing you’re in for a surprise!
2
Morning Miles.
I’m more concerned with the cunnilinguistic question me.
2
That inversion is still common in vernacular Scottish and Irish English, and long may it persist!
3
I couldn’t give a shit about my grammar as long as I get my message across.
8
Morning Dick, wouldnt worry about it,
As a rural sort just need to get your “oh’ before your’ Ah’,
Im not the sort to sit up all night worrying about Grammar, tend to make it up as i go.
4
My Grammar is no longer with us. God bless her!
She always used to say, “Slow and steady wins the race.”
Lovely woman. Unfortunately she died in a fire.
4
Dog bless her, Bertie.
Indeed. Slow and steady wins the race, fast and furious brings disgrace.
2
Money for old rope. No, old rope is better value than Grammarly. Which, I note, correctly attracts little wavy lines from my spellchecker. Enough with branding a non-existent need and selling its imperfect fulfilment to inadequate cunts, already.
3
Americanized arse riming obsequious condescending patronizing pocket filching cunt of a program …
Fuck me I’m a hypocrite. I’ll get my coat.
1
Their ‘woke’ Ytube adverts drive me up the fucking wall. Patronising in the extreme.
They can fuck right off. Cunts.
Afternoon all.
2
I seem to remember this being mentioned fairly recently yet I’ve still never seen anything for them, and don’t know who or what they are.
https://youtu.be/uLFiZfvL_L8
1
Thanks for the link (presumably admin), it appears to be an advert for learning how to write, something I learnt to do fairly successfully before I was 10.
1
No it was me.
1
Is there a difference?
Yes as far as we know they cant do this
1
Very ungrammatical name for grammatical software. Wouldn’t be caught dead with it on my laptop.
1