Callum Best

B7TAQcyIQAACbTg.jpg-large

A ‘professional celebrity’ (ie: a media whore), Callum will put his name to anything if the price or publicity is right… Nothing is too low for this cunt… Celebrity Big Brother being just one example…

The cunt has also (yet again!) cashed in on his famous and far more talented late father… Callum has put a book out called ‘Second Best…’ Obviously ghostwritten (the thick twat couldn’t write a shopping list!) and obviously done for the money (as always)… In it he comes out with ‘revelations’ that his dad, George, ‘physically assaulted’ him… Which basically means the little bastard got a slap when he acted up… If I wrote a book about the times my mum or dad gave me a crack for cheek or antics it would be 20 volumes long… This little shit will cash in on his father’s name until the day he dies (soon, I hope?)…

He is also a tasteless little cunt… On the very day of the 50th anniversary of the Munich Air Crash this little twat held a lavish, tacky birthday bash for himself in some garish nighspot… And this says it all: a few years ago he was asked about China and Darfur… Callum Best replied, ‘I think Darfur is great… He does some really cool designs…’ No joke, he thought Darfur was a fashion designer…

What a little fucktard of a cunt…

Nominated by: Norman

68 thoughts on “Callum Best

  1. Calum is a thick cunt. We all know Darfur was the dodgy little geezer in Minder. Well cunted Norman. He has been trying for years to get a career in films but 1) he is more wooden than Beckham and 2) he cannot remember his lines 3) audience response is “who is that cunt?”
    Did a spot in Footballers Wives but mostly doc features about daddy, magazine shoots and a spot orf soft porn. Oh yes and about drink addiction. So still living orf Georgie who was a nice bloke and genius footballer but with demons.

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/5377443/calum-best-reveals-results-of-second-hair-transplant.html

       2 likes

  2. When i saw the name callum Best ,I thought who the fuck is that ?
    And norman when i read down ,another steroid tatted tosser who makes headlines (forgive the pun) self nepotism and good words norm a crack around the lughole for parent worrying
    As goes for these afterbirths fuck em WASTERS
    two bob millionaires

       1 likes

  3. Rolf Harris has been taken to hospital after overdosing on chocolate despite being diabetic. I’m taking this as a suicide attempt and it’s the nearest I’ve been to winning the Dead Pool.
    And remember Sir Limply, if Doddy snuffs it, you owe me one.

       2 likes

  4. Take a look at these super-cunts in Paris. Fuck me, Europe needs to get together and show that we are the cradle of civilisation and drill these backward cunts into the 10th century. Fucking cowardly arseholes, I’m no francophile but we should back them and ruin the retarded Muslim states. Pricks.

       9 likes

    • That would be nice but merkel the cunt signed europe death certificate, rapes have doubled in germany with these cunt invaders( I refuse to call them asylum seekers). Merkel has been recently been boo’d and alot of germans want her to resign.

         8 likes

      • Those psychotic greasy bastards are at it again… I expect we will hear the same old excuses and shit from the BBC and other leftie cunts… Line the fucking apologists up next to the ISIS cunts and shoot them fuckers as well… Where’s your baby on the beach shite now, you cunts? And that stupid fat bitch, Merkel, has filled Europe with more of these cunts….

        This needs sorting… They should fuck off those cunts off at Calais for a fucking start…

           8 likes

        • “I expect we will hear the same old excuses and shit from the BBC and other leftie cunts”

          – BBC News couldn’t be more pro-Tory if it tried, Norman:

          Neither John Major’s Hinton Lecture where he attacked inequality, nor Gordon Brown’s speech to the Child Poverty Action Group where he demolished the so-called “eight lies peddled by the government about poverty”, nor the exchange of letters between Cameron and the leader of Oxfordshire County Council in which the PM revealed himself to be competely out of touch with the effects of so-called “austerity” were reported on BBC TV News bulletins. Gordon Brown’s speech was reported on the BBC News website – but mischaracterised as “a veiled attack on Corbyn” even though Corbyn was not mentioned by name and the Labour party mentioned only once in a brief aside; the substance of the speech – the Tories’ “eight lies” – was not mentioned at all. Two former PMs, one Tory, one Labour (admittedly both cunts) attack government policy on the same day and the BBC doesn’t consider this at all newsworthy.

          You won’t hear any criticism of the government’s position on BBC News, they don’t even give air time to anyone with contradictory opinions any more.

             6 likes

          • I agree about the BBC being pro-Tory, Fred… But there are lot of BBC cunts who are spreading this ‘Innocent Refugees’ bullshit, and even after today’s carnage in Paris they will still state the case for these cunts and give it all that ‘Kiddie on the beach’ bulllshit to back up their crap….

               6 likes

    • Religion itself needs cunting, but I agree, Islam appears to be the worst of these backwards, mind-washing superstitions.

         3 likes

      • Medieval death cult? I have fuck all love for Islam or any other superstitious crap but you cannot very well go around invading their countries and expect no consequences.

        It is international Jewry which is at the heart of the problem, not Islam.

           4 likes

        • Agreed the propaganda of islam is used as a tool(by the media, government) to scare the masses all the while secret agendas being carried out palestine syria etc. Now we have 2 million migrants in europe
          Making ordinary folks think the problem(islamic terrorists) is being taken care of through war(anti terror campaigns) but its not, but I still think Islam is one of the worst religions out there. Catholicism too but I don’t have anything against catholics in general. Its the papacy where the true evil lies read the history of the catholic church truly evil and corrupt indeed.

             4 likes

  5. Who the fuck would want to go to a night club?

    Ear-damaging shite coming out of the speakers, the vile stench of chemicals from all the filthy slags caked in make-up (and even that barely conceals the smell of their rotting syphilitic cunts and leaking rubber tits), over-priced booze (that is most likely counterfeit and will make you blind), violent drunks with the IQ of pencils, vomiting bitches crying about Wayne or Kevin, and strange creeps with weasel faces trying to sell drugs made from rat poison and 3rd-rate crack (that they say is a legal ‘high’).

    French President François Hollande is a cunt. The shit-faced frog cunt has vowed revenge on fuckers who have killed about 200 frogs in Paris (in revenge for France bombing them).

    Why France is bombing civilians in Syria and Iraq is a mystery.

    These fucking pig cunts in Europe like François Hollande, Nicolas Sarkozy, Tony Bliar, Gordon Brown, and David Cameron, were/are not randomly bombing people in Arab countries because it is in the national interest. They are doing it for personal gain (money from the military industrial complex and others).

    François Hollande is a cunt who kills people for money. What the fuck did the cunt expect when he sent yellow-belly filth in the air-force (as in all air-forces) to drop bombs on defenseless civilians.

    Over 500,000 civilians have been killed in Syria, and over 7 million displaced (because of homes destroyed, businesses destroyed, electricity generation plants destroyed, water treatment plants destroyed etc.) mostly resulting from the bombing by the US led ‘Coalition’.

    There are only a few hundred frogs dead in a revenge attack – so who are the real terrorists?

    These cunts, François Hollande, Nicolas Sarkozy, Tony Bliar, Gordon Brown, and David Cameron, will all burn in hell. Between them they have killed millions for the Americans (and those who control the US) for personal profit.

       2 likes

    • Well done! You win the prize for the maddest comment of 2015.

      Please report to Raqqa to be bummed to death by a group of AIDS carrying ISIS fucktards.

         3 likes

        • There is more truth in what he says than lies.

          US policy in the middle east has 2 driving factors, one is oil and securing it’s supply and the other is Israel.

          The people running oil companies are not the people actually in charge of them. As with any other business the oil industry cannot exist without credit. And who controls the credit? Banks, do off course and who controls the banks? Jews.

          There are so many Jews in the US, especially in positions of great power both in the banking sector and the media that it would be political suicide for any US politician not to back up Israel to the hilt. Despite any minor personal issues individual leaders may have the underlying and essential truth is always the same, America guarantees the existence of Israel.

          Its very convenient to promote Islamaphobia, its a classic smoke and mirrors misdirection magic trick.

             7 likes

          • Moaning about “Islamophobia” after blaming everything on “the Jews”? Do you work for the Guardian by any chance?

            Bet you anything you like that the perpetrators of the latest outrages in France were followers of the Religion of Peace and Universal Brotherhood rather than Judaism.

               4 likes

    • Over 500,000 civilians have been killed in Syria, and over 7 million displaced (because of homes destroyed, businesses destroyed, electricity generation plants destroyed, water treatment plants destroyed etc.) mostly resulting from the bombing by the US led ‘Coalition’.

      In reply to this,

      There are only a few hundred frogs dead in a revenge attack – so who are the real terrorists?

      These cunts, François Hollande, Nicolas Sarkozy, Tony Bliar, Gordon Brown, and David Cameron, will all burn in hell. Between them they have killed millions for the Americans (and those who control the US) for personal profit.

      Syria’s civil war is between muslim sects, by their very nature muslims cannot live in peace if someone thinks differently from them and dares to voice it. Western forces were asked to intervene and after careful consideration did so. Depending on what sect you support this is obviously a bone of contention.

         4 likes

  6. muhammad was a child molesting peadophile, he married aisha when she was 6 and consummated the marriage when she was 9, this historical account is written in the hadiths. Now Western people have cottoned on to it muslim religious scholars are back peddling in swarms trying to distort that fact. Not allowed to look at him or see pictures of him, makes sense I wouldn’t want my picture shown if I was guilty of peadophilia, you can liken that to having a blanket thrown over your head so no one sees you going to court for raping children. islam itself is a backward religion of violence and hypocrisy, if anyone of that faith tells you it’s a religion of peace they are not a good muslim and not doing it right.

       10 likes

    • In the interest of perspective;

      The youngest monarch to marry was David II, who married Joan, daughter of Edward II when he was 4 years, 134 days old in 1328.

      The youngest female monarch at the time of her marriage was Mary II, who was 15 years, 188 days old when she married William III in 1677.

      The youngest queen consort was Isabella of Valois, who married Richard II when she was 6 years, 358 days old in 1396.

         0 likes

        • Indeed times do change, Mohamed was married in 629 so don’t try to impose Western 21st century values on a 5th century Arab.

             0 likes

          • But Islam imposses those
            5 th century values on 21 st century arabs ( and the rest ).

               3 likes

          • and while we are at it shagging kids was not a ‘standard’ even in the 5 th century.

               3 likes

      • As we’re putting things in perspective no one was worshipping those monarchs on a religious basis, marriages to strengthen royal pacts are token marriages and there is no information about those marriages being consummated at the girls young ages. Peado mo is a worshipped religious figure and is the personification of islam’s moral compass and standards and that is why islamic scholars are desperately trying to make excuses regarding her age at consummation. Even by 5th century arab standards mo was a peado.

        muslims cannot and will not integrate in Western society because we are not muslim, they can’t even integrate with each other when you look at the sunnis and the shia.

        RIP the victims of this religious terrorist attack in France.

           8 likes

        • Quote
          “As we’re putting things in perspective no one was worshipping those monarchs on a religious basis”

          That’s were you are wrong. You see, every British monarch has to prove they are direct descendants of God.

             1 likes

          • Then show me oh enlightened one via a link to back up your claim! if i’m wrong i’ll gladly put matters right, I mean after a claim like that you can do that can’t you?

            You do know that claiming to be a descendant of god is different than the claim by muslims that peado mo is the last prophet sent by god to mankind.

            I am not trying to insult you but by what you write you are way out of your depth in religious theological debate, but by all means prove me wrong but not by google copy and paste and hope for the best nonsense! At least try and research and actually know the subject you are trying to debate.

               2 likes

  7. Quote
    “Moaning about “Islamophobia” after blaming everything on “the Jews”? Do you work for the Guardian by any chance?

    Bet you anything you like that the perpetrators of the latest outrages in France were followers of the Religion of Peace and Universal Brotherhood rather than Judaism.”

    Obviously one of the more gullible sheep the Jewish media has created….

       2 likes

    • Brilliant. Well done! Bra-fucking-vo.

      With intellects as vast as your’s on their case, “the Jews” must be quaking in their boots.

      By the way, did you know that Elvis Presley murdered President Kennedy? “The Jews” covered it up!

      Meanwhile, over a hundred people are dead in Paris.

         2 likes

      • How many dead in Iraq? How many dead in Afghanistan? How many dead in Libya? How many dead in Syria? No one knows for sure because no body has been bothered to count, so little do Muslim lives mean to the US/Israel corporate war machine.

           2 likes

          • If that is your position then the 120+ people killed in Paris last night should be merely collateral damage, an inevitable consequence of France’s military adventurism in the middle East and nothing what so ever to get upset about.

               2 likes

        • This is a very good point Fat Rich, sadly most people prefer blinkers on because that point is very hard to swallow in the face of terrorist attacks.

             2 likes

          • I would imagine America’s holier than thou attitude is very hard to swallow after your family has just been slaughtered in a drone strike.

               1 likes

          • Don’t bother Fat rich CMC has a rabbi fetish and a tendency to discredit anything by accusing you of believing in outlandish conspiracy theories. Especially when the cold hard facts say otherwise. It’s called controlled opposition you present facts or good points that are relevant to the issue and the opposition instead of researching what you are saying is true or relevant. They instead attack your character or intellect to discredit you.

               3 likes

  8. “France’s military adventurism in the Middle East”? France ruled Lebanon and Syria as mandates from the League of Nations for a few decades after the First World War. Most of the Middle East has been under various Muslim rulers since the mid-7th Century.

    From where do most of that part of the world’s problem come?

       0 likes

  9. A brief history lesson;

    French colonies in North Africa and Middle East;

    French Morocco (1912–1956) (protectorate) (89% of the current territory) (now Morocco)
    French Algeria (1830–1962) (Now Algeria)
    Oran (department) (1848–1962)
    Constantine (department) (1848–1962)
    Alger (department) (1848–1962)
    French colony of El Kala (1560–1829)
    Egypt (ownership (1798–1801)) (financial Condominium of France and the United Kingdom) (1876–1882)[6]
    French Tunisia (1881–1956) (protectorate) (Now Tunisia)
    French naval Base at Bizerte (1956-1963)[7]
    Libya
    Fezzan-Ghadames (1943–1951) (administration given by the UNO after its conquest by Charles de Gaulle)

    That is to say, the French colonised most of North Africa from 1560 to 1963.

    Post first world war, Laurence of Arabia and all that;

    During the two years that followed the end of the war in 1918 – and in accordance with the Sykes-Picot Agreement that was signed between Britain and France during the war – the British held control of most Ottoman Mesopotamia (modern Iraq) and the southern part of the Ottoman Syria (Palestine and Transjordan), while the French controlled the rest of Ottoman Syria (modern Syria, Lebanon, Alexandretta) and other portions of southeastern Turkey.

    That is to say; France and Britain carved up the middle East between them and against the wishes of the local people, after WW1.

    More recently;

    In late September 2012, reports surfaced about the involvement of French secret services in the tracking and killing of Muammar Gaddafi. According to some sources, Gaddafi was in fact killed by a French spy who infiltrated the mob of rebels that captured Gaddafi, and shot him in the head after his capture.

    Very recently;

    France To Send Aircraft Carrier To Fight IS

    The Charles de Gaulle will boost the US-led coalition as it carries out air strikes against Islamic State targets.

    http://news.sky.com/story/1582781/france-to-send-aircraft-carrier-to-fight-is

    That only a few days ago.

    Forgive me if I have come to the wrong conclusion, but I’d say that is a continuous and persistent intervention in North Africa and the Middle East by France.

       1 likes

      • So you like lists eh, Adolf.

        – number of Jewish states in the world = 1
        – area of Israel = approx. the same as Wales
        – number of members of the Arab League = 22
        – number of members of the Organisation of Islamic Co-operation = 57
        – number of Jews in the world = 14,000,000
        – number of Muslims in the world = 1,600,000,000
        – approx. number of Islamist attacks since 9th September 2001 = more than 27,000
        – East African slave trade ran from the mid-7th century to the 20h century.

        “The Jews” accepted this plan; guess who refused it!

        http://www.mideastweb.org/unpartition.htm

           1 likes

        • It appears Callum Best has got off lightly, due to recent tragic events… But he is still a cunt….

          Of course it had to happen… As sure as shit is shat and night follows day… A ‘You’ll Never Walk Alone’ tribute in french tricolor colours on social media from you know who… Griefjacking, professional mourning Scouse cunts…

             5 likes

          • Indeed it does Mr Barnaby. My point was that perhaps our Arab friends should have compromised with “the Jews” back in the 1940s.
            The evil Zionists agreed to the partition, the Arabs didn’t.

               0 likes

          • So why should they compromise on a decision made by others at the detriment of themselves? …… That would be like a cabal of Indonesia, Malaysia, Korea and Japan giving half of my house to an African family.
            It isn’t as if the agreement in 1947 has been respected, neither to the Palestinians or the borders of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan or Egypt.

               1 likes

  10. Quote
    “Then show me oh enlightened one via a link to back up your claim! if i’m wrong i’ll gladly put matters right, I mean after a claim like that you can do that can’t you?

    You do know that claiming to be a descendant of god is different than the claim by muslims that peado mo is the last prophet sent by god to mankind.

    I am not trying to insult you but by what you write you are way out of your depth in religious theological debate, but by all means prove me wrong but not by google copy and paste and hope for the best nonsense! At least try and research and actually know the subject you are trying to debate.”

    Well, Mr Hun I’d be glad to but you see I really don’t have to as there is a hole the size of Jupiter right in the middle of your argument. In fact 2 holes; “no one was worshipping those monarchs on a religious basis” and “”Peado mo is a worshipped religious figure”

    No he isn’t. Muslims worship Allah, not Mohammed. It is expressly forbidden to worship any other than Allah;

    “Say (O Muhammad): ‘I am only a man like you. It has been inspired to me that your God is One God (Allah). So whoever hopes for the Meeting with his Lord, let him work righteousness and associate none as a partner in the worship of his Lord.’” [The Qur’an: al-Kahf 18:110]

    This was further emphasised by Mohamed himself;

    “Do not exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praised the son of Mary (i.e. Jesus), for I am only [Allah’s] slave. So, call me the slave of Allah and His messenger.” [Saheeh al-Bukhari: 654]

    Tut tut, schoolboy error Mr Hun. Are you sure it is I who is out of his depth?

       2 likes

    • And that is why no one in the West has been killed for showing mo’s picture, that is why you don’t see outraged muslims on tv protesting en masse over publications that dare print a picture of mo in jest or otherwise, because he is not worshipped right? muslims pray to allah but nevertheless worship and revere peado mo and the most extreme muslims are prepared to die for him, I can’t really think of a stronger case of not worshiping someone.

      Schoolboy error, hardly, the fact you can’t read between the lines but can use google doesn’t make you a religious historian, however i’m pleased you made the effort.

         4 likes

      • I don’t claim to be a religious historian, but you can’t accept defeat. There are no lines to read between here, Mohamed is not worshiped by Muslims, there is no grey area.

           2 likes

        • I won’t accept something not deserved, you are far more concerned with a win/lose scenario and being right that you refuse to accept clear evidence. Are you so determined to be right you have forgotten the definitionS of the word worship, here let me remind you,

          Worship; Great admiration or devotion shown towards a person or principle:
          the worship of celebrity and wealth
          MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES
          SYNONYMS
          1.3 archaic Honour given to someone in recognition of their merit.
          Religious rites or ceremonies, constituting a formal expression of reverence for a deity:
          the church was opened for public worship

          Take your time reading the first part of the definitionS and try harder to be open minded on a subject (islam and muslims) i’ve studied for decades,

          My original point stands, mo was a peado, by our 21st century standards and by arab 5th century standards, mo is worshipped by muslims worldwide that in extreme cases as in the Charlie Hebdo attacks will kill and are willing to be killed to defend mo’s name, the fact you are trying to use semantics rather than admit it is your problem.

          If you really prefer a win/lose type debate you can always try the acid test, walk into any mosque at calling to prayer on a Friday and ask if the muslims think mo was a peado, while you’re running for your life you can ponder the definitions of worship and if you manage to escape you can come back and tell me I was right, I wouldn’t care but by the looks of your replies it may give you some closure.

             15 likes

          • Yeah yeah yeah, I think we all know that when some one gets down to semantics that their argument is lost.

               0 likes

          • I don’t want to be the bearer of bad news rich but you just got fucking owned mate lol

               9 likes

          • Just make sure you have your trainers on before you test out how peaceful their religion is 😉

            ‘If you really prefer a win/lose type debate you can always try the acid test, walk into any mosque at calling to prayer on a Friday and ask if the muslims think mo was a peado, while you’re running for your life you can ponder the definitions of worship and if you manage to escape you can come back and tell me I was right, I wouldn’t care but by the looks of your replies it may give you some closure.’

            I’ll be laughing about this part all week.

               4 likes

          • Yeah yeah yeah, I think we all know that when some one gets down to semantics that their argument is lost.

            If you are of limited intelligence then that is quite possibly true otherwise semantics can and do play an important role in a debate.

            There wasn’t a win lose situation here but when someone writes a phrase with ‘I think we all know’ included they are on their last legs and looking at the evidence it would seem it was only you who thought he knew.

            I don’t see a reply with any substance in return from you any time soon so I’m done in this debate, good luck with your outlook in life, it must be quite debilitating ignoring evidence around you when you could’ve learned something just so you can think you’re right.

            I don’t think you deserve the courtesy of an informative reply but I have fifteen minutes until my train, good day.

               2 likes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *